-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
should tracy be sacked?
- Thread starter zgod
- Start date
Ian4 said:
And that's the worst part here. So much just doesn't sound right and didn't from the beginning. Even after the police have concluded their investigation the media and others are still trying to claim Martin deserve a huge whack for threatening to stab a woman, when it seems he didn't.
For the police to make such a strong and definitive press release like they did, it can only be assumed no one corroborated the woman's version of events, not even those close by. If the police could release all the interview transcripts yarn maybe we, joe public, would have some closure, but they won't.
So now we have Martin with the lingering stench of a woman basher. Tracey and her employees still trying to keep the waters murky. Definitely no winners here except maybe some free press for Mr Miyagi, but who knows if that's a good or bad thing for them.
Baloo said:
This is where there is no equality. 'Tracey' could be lying her arse off but the mud will stick to Martin and quite frankly that's a sh!thouse outcome.
rosy23 said:
Wasn't up to her to press charges Rosy and based on what is in the VicPol statement I think it would have been highly unlikely that charges would have been laid even if she had given a statement (honest or otherwise).
Some pretty sexist comments on here. Why should tracy be backed by default?
That's just lunacy and reeks of the way many in society today whilst trying to do good end up trying too hard and making a set of rules for one section which actually files in the face of what they are trying to achieve. Doing this is sexist as it takes away a mans rights. Its ok for a woman to cast stones and damage a mans reputation and than slink off into obscurity when it becomes s false allegation? Just modern day pc *smile*.
That's just lunacy and reeks of the way many in society today whilst trying to do good end up trying too hard and making a set of rules for one section which actually files in the face of what they are trying to achieve. Doing this is sexist as it takes away a mans rights. Its ok for a woman to cast stones and damage a mans reputation and than slink off into obscurity when it becomes s false allegation? Just modern day pc *smile*.
Carter suggested that women should be backed by default.rosy23 said:
Put it this way Rosy. What if a mans story was backed by default? "IT" is the fact that a mans reputation can be trashed if we back a woman's story by default.
I agree its funny and its pc gone mad.
Exactly what culture would that be Carts?Carter said:
Would it be the predominant white western christian culture? Perhaps the muslim culture or indigenous culture, hell why don't we simply rely on the modern popular culture of entitlement or blame that seems to be doing so well at present?
Reality is, we no longer have a culture in this country. It's all about appeasing n bending to whichever culture screams loudest in this wonderful, enlightened, modern multi cultural society we live in.
What happens if there is a clash of cultures, or perhaps even some fool decides your culture or any one else's version of culture is irrelevant? Perhaps they might be to drunk or stoned to even understand the relevance of your version of culture.
Sorry Carts, culture, especially in a multi cultural society runs a poor second to the law of the country you happen to be standing in at the time.
