3121FC said:if l dont see omited next to his name dimma should be sacked...
You won't & he won't
We love medicrity
3121FC said:if l dont see omited next to his name dimma should be sacked...
tigertim said:It's neck and neck between Hampy and Tom: http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_player_compare?tid1=15&pid1=1735&tid2=17&pid2=3506&type=T&fid1=S&fid2=S
Toms 5 goals puts him ahead IMO. Although tommy kills him for clangers.
Hard to compare Hampy with Orren as Orren doesn't get the same opportunities Hampy does.
buenavista said:That adds a lot to the discussion
mad_doggy911 said:Could've we got Taylor at pick 32 or whatever it turned out to be?
That could've been our small forward right there for the next 10 years.
I think we're talking about Lewis Taylor not Taylor Adams.zippadeee said:Collingwood supporters want him out. 30 touches none hit a target
Thank Christ we didn't him too
tonemaster said:Hampson was recruited so we don't get slaughtered in the ruck by the ruck giants.
I would assume, and I agree wholeheartedly, that the Richmond brains trust concluded that we lost that final against the Blues because Maric was absolutely pantsed in the ruck that day by the giant, Warnock. Rucks aren't that important, unless you get pantsed in the ruck. Then they're ridiculously important.
Getting Hampson was about not getting pantsed in the ruck. Maric, Stephenson, Graham and Derickx are each too short or unathletic against the giant rucks. Although Hampson is a pretty ordinary player generally, he won't get pantsed in the ruck. He's too tall and athletic for that.
In my reckoning, that's why we bothered to get him.
No Taylor went 28, Hampson trade was 32 after compo picks. We could never of had Taylor.mad_doggy911 said:Could've we got Taylor at pick 32 or whatever it turned out to be?
That could've been our small forward right there for the next 10 years.
zippadeee said:Name another ruckman that can't mark and can't kick
Tames said:Damien thought he played OK. Going along those lines, he's pretty much in the side as long as DH is around.
Played ok..wow.Tames said:Damien thought he played OK. Going along those lines, he's pretty much in the side as long as DH is around.
funky said:Played ok..wow.
Yes no doubt there is more to the position, but the core competancy of a ruckman is providing the team with first use of the footy. Hit outs to advanatge are highly correlated to centre clearance and centre clearances are highly correlated to winning games. Maric will never provide this advanatage. Hampson might develop a more rounded game with some patience. Lets not forget he has been in the best a few times this year - he did not have a good game on the weekend but Sandilands would have had 60 hitouts had Hampson not played. Just as Goldstein was BOG when Hamspon did not play last week.bowden4president said:If a ruckmans job was to contest a ball up and then disappear in to thin air until the next one, Shaun Hampson would be one of the best pickups we have. Sadly there is more to the position than that.