shaun hampson threads [merged] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

shaun hampson threads [merged]

should We Recruit Him?

  • Yes

    Votes: 106 33.8%
  • No

    Votes: 173 55.1%
  • Cheese Sandwich / Don't Care

    Votes: 35 11.1%

  • Total voters
    314
evo said:
We are now seeing what blues supporters were saying all along.

Spud with a capital S

Plenty of Richmond supporters were saying it as well. He has always been *smile* useless and has got worse at RFC. Pick 32 :cutelaugh :cutelaugh :cutelaugh
 
I don't see why he's so useless. He got plenty of hit outs very few to our advantage though, something to work with i would have thought
 
SkillzThatKillz said:
Thought he had a shocker last night.

Liked tapping backwards which is fine in non-greasy conditions but tapped it to the advantage of the opposition time after time.

Poor handballing skills too.

Same tonight.

Plenty of hit outs but very few to our advantage and some directly to opposition players.

We need Maric back.

Just wondering if Vickery and Griff is the better ruck combo in the meantime.
 
I'd be more chance of taking a contested mark than this guy. Shame I'm not more chance with Meg's!
 
It's impossible to mark when you only use one arm.
All night he just lifted his left arm and didn't go near marking a ball.
That's why getting McEvoy would've been a 1000 times better.
 
Didn't look fully fit to me, but yes, his marking efforts looked pretty poor.

I thought his tap work was ok. Our mids weren't setting the world on fire. Brisbane mids roved well to Hampson
 
Interesting assessment here. The guys on Fox's war room said he was stiff not to get a vote, they tossed up the one vote between he and Jack, eventually gave it to Jack for his 4 goals.
 
CarnTheTiges said:
Interesting assessment here. The guys on Fox's war room said he was stiff not to get a vote, they tossed up the one vote between he and Jack, eventually gave it to Jack for his 4 goals.
1 kick, no marks, 7 handballs....yes 52 hit outs (how many to advantage?) don't think that would make him worthy of 3rd best on ground.