lamb22 said:I dont know if anyone has noticed but our clearance work has been diabolical this year.
Last week we had 8 inside 50s in the first half.
However Hampson "competes".
FMD!
dusty delivers said:Why are we going OK in goals from stoppages then? We beat the crows easily in that stat as we did with Pies & Blues. Clearance stats against the eagles show 34 to WC and 33 to us. CC were 14-13 to them. Stoppages 23-20. Not a massacre. Yet we were.
Been killed on turnovers in most games which I assume has nothing to do with Hampson (because he rarely gets it).
It's not stoppages that are killing us. It's poor ball movement, overuse of handball, poor decision making and back half panicking from the likes of houli that's killing us.
diggler said:A dud is a dud is a dud.
Only dopey ferals who have loser mentalities rate this dud
lamb22 said:BTW Vickery and Griffiths are miles better footballers than Shaun despite their documented weaknesses.
And both Vickery and Griffith are one head knock away from being concussed into retirementlamb22 said:Hampson is probably the worst footballer to play the game this century.
Any argument he should play before any one else on our list is ludicrous.
BTW Vickery and Griffiths are miles better footballers than Shaun despite their documented weaknesses.
Harry said:Seems we're obliged to play him to justify the second rounder we gave up. Each time he gets injured you can hear the sigh of relief from the selection panel
Rancey18 said:Won 6 lost 13 when we have had Hamspon playing. We seem to not play near as well when we have him and not Maric. Hit outs have always been one of the most overrated stats in my book. Im much more interested in ruckman who are able to generate clearances by tackling hard and clearing a path for the midfielders (Mummy), or who provide an outlet around the ground (Goldstein, Gawn). Hampson does neither of these unfortunately imo.
Dyer'ere said:Hampson is in no form to be getting attention from models, least of all one he's married to.