who knows if Kingy's Powerball numbers come up?
Maybe. Probably not. I'm not here to convince on something rarely seen in footy.
What I am more certain about is that we NEED those numbers and more. Look at the list.
Those calling for softly, softly are in line for some disappointment. Years worth. The next North Melbourne.
Dimma already had a few keystones when he started but still only just scraped through in 2016, when those guys were entering their prime.
We need those faaaarking numbers to come up. Most of all Yze needs some of those numbers.
We're talking across each other. For the purposes of this discussion, they are everything. Everything does not literally mean every player on the list.
If we didn't already have a good hand from last year and all the picks that come with finishing at the bottom, you'd have a point. (I think we currently have the most points by a fair way? Could be wrong but we have a lot). If we didn't know that we will be trading some players, and we will be, you'd have a point.
This is saying flog the lot, or we're weak as *smile*, which just isn't valid. Its silly tabloid sensationalism.
We'll get another good pick for Bakes, there will be another trade or 3, dunno who, some picks for points deals, we'll end up with a good hand in a good draft.
got it, all good. comes down to an assessment of list.We're talking across each other. For the purposes of this discussion, they are everything. Everything does not literally mean every player on the list.
If we didn't already have a good hand from last year and all the picks that come with finishing at the bottom, you'd have a point. (I think we currently have the most points by a fair way? Could be wrong but we have a lot). If we didn't know that we will be trading some players, and we will be, you'd have a point.
This is saying flog the lot, or we're weak as *smile*, which just isn't valid. Its silly tabloid sensationalism.
We'll get another good pick for Bakes, there will be another trade or 3, dunno who, some picks for points deals, we'll end up with a good hand in a good draft.
id rather losing Powerball with my mates,
than win Powerball with no mates
Yeah ain't happening even if we want it to happen.Hang on, so we get 7, 8, 10, 13, 16, 20 and a future 1st for Rioli, Baker, Bolton and Martin? 7 1st rounders for them? I'd be surprised.
We trade out all our experience we lose every game by 80-100 points, lose the good young players we do get and resign ourselves to a decade in the doldrums.
We already have a very early draft pick, a whole stack of later picks that can be traded into earlier picks. Realistically you would probably only have 5- 6 kids taken in the draft. I think baker is likely gone. We will likely end up with a late first / early second round pick for him.
Dusty is a free agent so we aren't getting a first round pick for him even if he did leave. Think its more likely he retires.
The value thing we could and should be doing is acquiring talent not currently getting a game on other lists via player for player trades with some of our fringe talent. Would another club like to get a look at a Sonsie for example who i have my doubts over? Grigg for Collins caused melts galore here when it happened (Lenny Hayes mark 2 according to some) but there is value to be found in filling holes on the list with some moneyball type players as well as using the draft.
Hopefully Hartley, Livingstone, Toce etc have a more sensible and less doomsday approach than some here and in the media (2016 they told us to trade all our good middle aged players for draft picks coz we wouldnt win a flag with that lot).
I'd love to play alongside Rioli. Of the three in question he's the one I'd least enjoy seeing in other colours.
Bolton is staying
Dusty will retire 80% chance my guess
Baker 90% chance to go we would get a first round 10-20 pick. Not sure where WC gets that type of pick. Freo might play trading two of their picks in the 10-20 range for WC pick 3 or for WC 2025 round pick. Say WC give us pick 13
Rioli is the interesting one. Sellers market here. If he wants out then it is 2 first rounds and I am looking at Suns first two picks currently 7 and 8. This is where we would need to be ruthless. Maybe give back a second round
We then have the mulitude of lower picks to trade for say Brisbane's first round currently pick 12
So agree with King we would have 1, 7, 8, 12, 13 and our first round pick of round 2
List changing hand of draft picks and what we need to do.
With Tasmania coming into play in a few years we then use the 2015 to draft for needs and maybe bring our future first round into that year
Then fill gaps with free agents 2026 - 2028
I vote half ruthless, if the price is right: half reluctant.
trading is all about extracting a high value.
So yeah if Bakes and Danny nets pick 3 and 7, yay.
if its pick 19 and 22, boo.
we'd need the keys to AFL house and a blank premiership cup and an engraver for me to sell $hai.
and if we sell dusty, RFC has one less member and lifelong lover. I'm Divorced.
the full ruthless scenario creates a list management bottleneck amidst a cultural wasteland.
unless you traded the 2024 super hand into 25 and 26 (just before Tassie)
you've got a problematically skewed list age profile and all that goes with that.
plus, too many first rounders in one year increases the likelihood of busts, as counter intuitive as that sounds - GWS and SUNS have had 48 TOP TEN picks through the Dustin Martin era. How's that worked out?
there is only so much talent on offer. if your panning a stream for gold, a gigantic gold pan wont guaranteed you riches
so, yeah, for me, steady as she goes middle road, rather than scorched earth.
I have a lot of lived experience as an all-or-nothing bloke, and believe me, the ALL is very, very, difficult to pull off
lynch, short, pickett, vlastuin, broad, taranto and hopper is a pretty good remaining core IMO
I thought there's 4?
posting Eric but I don't think the list is in any way comparable with 2016
we don't have Rance, Riewoldt, Cotchin, Martin yet.
maybe Godcus but you get my point. we need to trawl this draft and find the mids everyone is talking about.
And pray this is not a dud draft group that pops up from time to time.I've been saying it for a while. Kingy (who I really like) said it today:
“So if they (trade Rioli, Baker, Bolton and maybe Martin), Richmond at the moment have got Pick 1 and 21. They would end up with something like 1, 7,8, 10, 13, 16, 20 and their own 21 and a future first coming in."
What do we lose? Some on-field leadership, for sure. But just look at what we gain. Our next flag kickstarted, right here, right now, in 2024.
We'd still have experience on every line -
Vlastuin, Broad, Short
Taranto, Hopper, Pickett
Lynch, Balta
Ruthless Richmond or Reluctant Richmond? Do we want to shake the competition down for everything it has to offer and say "we are faaaarking Richmond and won't be down for long" or do we bow our heads and disappear into the long night?
Let's *smile* go!
And pray this is not a dud draft group that pops up from time to time.