Top stuffObviously a lot of (additional) changeover on the list is coming. People on here seem to want to cull half the list.
If we look back on our last rebuild when Hardwick came on Board we cut hard. Before he started out went 12
Retired
Bowden
Richo
Sugar Kane
NBrown
Cogs
Delisted
Cleve Hughes
Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls
Adam Pattison
Pettifer
Polak
Putt
Jarrod Silvester
After year 1 Hardwick sent another 7 packing
Alroy Gilligan
Tom Hislop
Jordan McMahon
Dean Polo
Relton Roberts
Adam Thomson
Plus Cuz
So, basically half the list was gone in 2 years.
We drafted JR and Shedda in 2006, Cotch and Rance in 2007, and Dusty and Astbury in 2009.
We have already lost more quality in the last 3 years than we lost when Hardwick arrived. I don't think we have drafted any players as good as the above in the last 3 years. I'm not sure we can cut as deep as some would like. In addition to needing to nail our next few drafts, we need to balance who goes out while keeping some leadership around.
That’s the key, isn’t it. Not only will we have draft picks galore but we’ll have salary cap to attract mature players. Will be a year or two before we go shopping though, won’t be at all surprised if we pay part of the salaries of those we trade out. Need to hit the min salary cap and not overpay players who haven’t earned it.What is this ‘balance’ people keep going on about?
We are looking to rebuild the midfield and Taranto/Hopper will still be there to lead the youngsters
Losing Baker, Bolton and Rioli will crack the sky wide open according to some on here
It’s just three guys. Bolton is the perfect trade and not much of an on-field leader. Baker is overrated.
Rioli is a loss both quality and leadership wise but we cannot rejuvenate without giving something away.
List balance is not the uppermost priority this year or next. But the list will settle once our next gen hit 50 games and we can complement them with some mature muscle.
Are they your system 10 lotto numbers ? Might give them a go myself if you don’t mind. Probably a better chance of winning than those numbers coming up in our draft.I was just having a bit of fun throwing some things out there but if you think about it its not a huge reach.
Is Liam Baker plus pick 33 worth pick 12 and 25 ?. I think that would be in the ball park.
Common Knowledge that GCS have been talking to Dan Rioli. 27 yo contracted until 2027. I think pick 6 and 20 is very much in play.
Graham well talk is Eagles, he would get us a pick around 40 depending on size of contract. Again doable if Graham wants out.
We have an abundance of picks that can be bundled up to clubs who need them for f/s and acadamy picks. a top 20 very gettable.
I think Dusty will retire so no we don't keep Dusty but Shai is younger than Rioli and is contracted until 2028 i think we can wait a year and if need be trade him next year for good draft picks.
The only scenario im doubtful about is the splitting of pick 1 with it supposedly such an even top 20.
Still even if we don't split pick one it still leaves something like this
1, 6, 12, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 40, 41. Not a draft hand to be sneezed at.
If we trade out contracted players like Short, Rioli & Bolton we’ll have to pay some of their salaries to get the high draft picks we hope they’ll command.That’s the key, isn’t it. Not only will we have draft picks galore but we’ll have salary cap to attract mature players. Will be a year or two before we go shopping though, won’t be at all surprised if we pay part of the salaries of those we trade out. Need to hit the min salary cap and not overpay players who haven’t earned it.
Nothing will crack the sky, but it will probably keep us firmly anchored to the bottom of the ladder for the next 3 seasons at a minimum and there won’t be a lot of light at the end of the tunnel, and it will also ensure that your messiah Yze won’t survive past 2026.What is this ‘balance’ people keep going on about?
We are looking to rebuild the midfield and Taranto/Hopper will still be there to lead the youngsters
Losing Baker, Bolton and Rioli will crack the sky wide open according to some on here
It’s just three guys. Bolton is the perfect trade and not much of an on-field leader. Baker is overrated.
Rioli is a loss both quality and leadership wise but we cannot rejuvenate without giving something away.
List balance is not the uppermost priority this year or next. But the list will settle once our next gen hit 50 games and we can complement them with some mature muscle.
What is this ‘balance’ people keep going on about?
We are looking to rebuild the midfield and Taranto/Hopper will still be there to lead the youngsters
Losing Baker, Bolton and Rioli will crack the sky wide open according to some on here
It’s just three guys. Bolton is the perfect trade and not much of an on-field leader. Baker is overrated.
Rioli is a loss both quality and leadership wise but we cannot rejuvenate without giving something away.
List balance is not the uppermost priority this year or next. But the list will settle once our next gen hit 50 games and we can complement them with some mature muscle.
1) multiple picks coming back to usJust 3 guys?
The three players we get for them will just be three guys as well.
The question is, will they be a better 3 guys?
In all likelihood, no.
1) multiple picks coming back to us
2) younger players with more years ahead of them, coming through together
This should be obvious, of course
Some of the analysis on here is painfully tedious
We are anchored at the bottom of the ladder and those guys are playing.Nothing will crack the sky, but it will probably keep us firmly anchored to the bottom of the ladder for the next 3 seasons at a minimum and there won’t be a lot of light at the end of the tunnel, and it will also ensure that your messiah Yze won’t survive past 2026.
It’s also gonna have to be a damn good draft, because while we’ll get a good pick because we’re crap for the next few years we won’t have much, if anything, to trade out for other good picks.We are anchored at the bottom of the ladder and those guys are playing.
But I get your point. For me it’s crucial we keep other leaders around for the next couple of years. Nank, Broad, Vlastuin, Prestia, Lynch. Then there is Taranto and Hopper.
If that core can remain in place then I am ok to go all out and get as much draft capital this year.
No guarantees these kids are any better.Just 3 guys?
The three players we get for them will just be three guys as well.
The question is, will they be a better 3 guys?
In all likelihood, no.