rokkafella said:Anyone else think west coast is over rated, they've beaten no one this year and commentators are calling then contenders.
waiting said:Yep .
Sandilands record 70 HO. 15 to advantage. Just shows how important he was in the last that GC had the ball inside their F50 but couldn't get first hand as Sandilands was hitting it where he wanted it.
Fyfe was better in the second half.
In the end 7 Pts.
23 to 11 shots. Could have been a comfortable win but under the conditions many rushed behinds and missed chances. GCS took their chances.
Inside 50 51-27 favouring Freo.
GCS extracted everything they could from all their players considering their mounting injury list. Did very well.
Nearly pulled off the upset of the year.
TigerMasochist said:Doesn't hurt to see Sydaknee getting well on top of the Kangas, the bigger log jam of teams struggling outside the eight, the more room for us to stay inside it.
2 of their next 3 are against GWS and Geel so they could lose those but yes, you would give them at least 6 out of 8 prior to meeting Freo which would put them on 11-8 with 3 to play.Then they would need only 1 maybe 2 of those last 3 (Freo, Bulldogs, us).LeeToRainesToRoach said:North has almost the kindest run imaginable over the next eight weeks. Chance to go 8-0; finals certainties IMO.
jb03 said:2 of their next 3 are against GWS and Geel so they could lose those but yes, you would give them at least 6 out of 8 prior to meeting Freo which would put them on 11-8 with 3 to play.Then they would need only 1 maybe 2 of those last 3 (Freo, Bulldogs, us).
Hmmm, they will make it.
jb03 said:2 of their next 3 are against GWS and Geel so they could lose those but yes, you would give them at least 6 out of 8 prior to meeting Freo which would put them on 11-8 with 3 to play.Then they would need only 1 maybe 2 of those last 3 (Freo, Bulldogs, us).
Hmmm, they will make it.
Tigers of Old said:Did the ladder predictor. Think teams will need 13 wins this year to make it. Don't see us finishing top 4 even if we have a good run.
Total match scores at the moment are quite low. The scoring increase/bonanza predicted by the scribes does not seem to have eventuated.LeeToRainesToRoach said:Essendon averaging under 73 points per match - their lowest since 1956. If they score < 60 against Hawthorn, it'll be their lowest since 1927.