Round 1 (2022) - other games | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Round 1 (2022) - other games

Exactly, he has a source in the club, he uses it, that's his job. His story was right.

Bevo, tighten up the ship mate - that's on you and the club if someone is leaking. Bevo can stand up for his club but he overplayed his hand, telling Morris to get out and then having to skulk out himself. A bluff that failed. Now that was embarrassing.
Bevo was deflecting from his and his sides *smile* performance. Cheating isn't a good long term coaching strategy. A genuine football side found them out. As we do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
WB seemed to be doing very well on the free kick count ... again

I think in 2016 & 2021 (made GF's ) they were > 25%
and they had healthy figures in the other years

if the umpiring is more of the same I fear we will be on the bottom of the free kick differential ladder ... again :-(
 
Bevo was deflecting from his and his sides *smile* performance. Cheating isn't a good long term coaching strategy. A genuine football side found them out. As we do.
That’s exactly what he was doing. He’s been watching Ted Lasso.
 
No. They were lucky to be that close initially. They've got some of the worst talls in the AFL. Keath & Cordy the worst KD pair in the comp. Schache should be playing VFL. Weightman is their Rohan. Libba is done. Crumples is a cat. Daniels overrated as is Hunter.

They are coached to cheat, up there with Geelong as the worst stagers and chuckers.

And who were they missing?

Melb dominated, the scorebaord flattered footscray.
I missed the first quarter but when I started watching in the second quarter the Dogs went on an unanswered 6 goal spree and absolutely dominated the game. I believe they also kicked the last 2 goals of the first quarter to make it 8 unanswered goals? They won nearly every clearance and the much vaunted Melbourne midfield couldn't get hands on the ball. Naughton was killing them in the forward line. I think that Schache mistake really halted the Dogs momentum. Of course I can't definitively say the Dogs would have won if they kicked that goal but I think it would have been a very good chance.

But yes agree with you in general on the Dogs and their personnel and they way they play. I don't really like it either and I think Melbourne is clearly a better team and will beat them the majority of times they play.
 
WB seemed to be doing very well on the free kick count ... again

I think in 2016 & 2021 (made GF's ) they were > 25%
and they had healthy figures in the other years

if the umpiring is more of the same I fear we will be on the bottom of the free kick differential ladder ... again :-(
A bloke I work with is a Melbourne fan (didn't really know it until last year :mhihi). Anyway he went to the game last night and this morning was seething about the umpiring; 30-17 in favour of the Dogs!!!!

I told him to go and have a look at the free kick differentials from the past 5 seasons and then come and talk to me :mhihi
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
thought Bevo taking aim at Morris was more interesting than the game
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Please don't circumvent the swear filter. It is a pain for the mods to have to edit it. Just write the word and let the filter do its job. Thanks
thought Bevo taking aim at Morris was more interesting than the game
Can't watch other teams
It's *smile* impossible these days
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
It's interesting, the Dees have had 70 odd years of failure, they have a small membership base (understandable given the lack of success) and people decry them assistance?

The AFL is a socialist organisation, Richmond can only be powerful if the AFL exists. It only exists if the less well supported and therefore less financially stable clubs get a leg up.

This messaging regarding the tigers never getting any help and being victims who can't catch a break is ridiculous.
All valid points Jazz but the fact is as a club they cheated; deliberately lost games to enhance their draft position. The AFL even found them guilty but gave them a suspended fine and bankrolled a messiah coach for them. Ideally we wouldn't have to support teams that make their own mess but realistically the competition at this stage needs all the teams so it has to be done. As you say the AFL needs to do this for the competition to exist in its current format (how long that lasts remains to be seen).

The support they got after being found guilty of cheating is what I don't like. It doesn't sit well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Grant Thomas said the worse team to win a flag thing didn't he? Not sure I'd lose sleep about that.

To me the big difference between us and Melbourne is we weren't the best team in the competition in 2017, we were the best in September. We were the best in 2018 and failed in September.

Melbourne were the best at both in 2021 so naturally a different response. I feel like it took us until 2019 to really be seen as a quality team which was probably fair enough.
Jeez I'm agreeing with a lot of your stuff now TBR. The poor old tigers line is getting tiresome.

We've had a great run, I know a Saints supporter born in 67 who has been to every losing GF since then. Now that's sad.

Hopefully we have one more in us and we beat the Dees in the process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
All valid points Jazz but the fact is as a club they cheated; deliberately lost games to enhance their draft position. The AFL even found them guilty but gave them a suspended fine and bankrolled a messiah coach for them. Ideally we wouldn't have to support teams that make their own mess but realistically the competition at this stage needs all the teams so it has to be done. As you say the AFL needs to do this for the competition to exist in its current format (how long that lasts remains to be seen).

The support they got after being found guilty of cheating is what I don't like. It doesn't sit well.
They aren't the only side that were happy to lose. But it didn't help them for quite a period of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
This is spot on Spook. I don't mind this particular Melbourne team; can't criticise the way they play. They are pretty good to watch. But I can't stand them as a club. They've been spoon fed by the AFL for years; even had the AFL bankroll a "saviour" coach for a couple of years. They tanked and cheated, scapegoated Dean Bailey, and were found guilty but were hit with a suspended fine; real wet lettuce leaf stuff:rolleyes:. Quite frankly they should be good given how many very high draft picks they've had over the years and the leg up they've been given. Compare that to how we built our dynasty; chalk and cheese.
Hear hear Pudley ! One of your somewhat better posts.

I cant stand Melbourne as a club. No problem with how they play, their talent etc. right now. Fully deserve to be premiers and favourites again this year. But they've been a fair weather bunch Demon supporters for a looooong time. The biggest smart arses with any sniff of success and then not interested in football when they're on the down. Hawthorn fans very similar. Must be that preppy, higher income thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Grant Thomas said the worst team to win a flag thing didn't he? Not sure I'd lose sleep about that.

To me the big difference between us and Melbourne is we weren't the best team in the competition in 2017, we were the best in September. We were the best in 2018 and failed in September.

Melbourne were the best at both in 2021 so naturally a different response. I feel like it took us until 2019 to really be seen as a quality team which was probably fair enough.

Trust me, I ain't losing sleep over what the media say, especially when I refuse to fund the Murdoch Empire so the only coverage I know of at Fox comes from comments here.

I just reckon the post 2017 flag commentary was a bit, shall we say, sh!t. More of a reflection on the journos than anyone else really, I'm sure the other clubs were looking at Richmond and trying to work out how we smacked Adelaide, and Richmond would just have been grinning like a Cheshire Cat.

The journos do just look like numpties when they don't give respect after a team wins a flag, I'm not sure if they were expecting Richmond to return to the wilderness after 1 flag after the 2017 Grand Final, but in their opinions they were missing just how effective a lot of the players beyond the 4 big stars were.

A bit more respect would have been nice . . . then again, 3 flags is even nicer.

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
To me the big difference between us and Melbourne is we weren't the best team in the competition in 2017, we were the best in September.
Could not disagree more. We finished the H&A season half a game behind the Crows and behind Geelong on percentage. We smacked all 3 teams we played in the finals (including Crows and Geelong) by an average margin of 7.5 goals. We finished the season with 18 wins and 7 losses; best record of any team that year.

Not sure how say anyone could claim we weren't the best team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users
Grant Thomas said the worse team to win a flag thing didn't he? Not sure I'd lose sleep about that.

To me the big difference between us and Melbourne is we weren't the best team in the competition in 2017, we were the best in September. We were the best in 2018 and failed in September.

Melbourne were the best at both in 2021 so naturally a different response. I feel like it took us until 2019 to really be seen as a quality team which was probably fair enough.
The Crows beat us in Adelaide at the start of May after both sides had begun 5-0. After that game, they won 11 of 19 for the rest of the year. We won 14, and of the 5 we lost, 3 were by less than a kick (2 of which you could argue we were robbed) and 1 was by 2-3 goals away to a top-4 side with the biggest home ground advantage in the comp, when we played *smile*. We finished the regular season third, half a game behind the Crows and Cats - both of whom beat us at their home grounds, but neither of whom we got to play at ours. We then beat the other 3 top-4 sides in September by 51, 36 and 48. If we weren't the best team in the comp, who the hell was?

We were head and shoulders the best team in the comp, as we were for the next 3 years. Most acknowledged us as the best by pretty early in 2018.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
Worth remembering in 2017 we were playing with one key forward, a wing as a second ruck and playing some weird game style where we got smashed in clearance and then got the ball back. Would have been a brave pundit to call a dynasty. :ROFLMAO:



Best home and away team I should have said. No way we were that, finished third, didn't beat 1 and 2, got belted by Adelaide and St Kilda and lost a couple of unloseable games through sheer stupidity.
Only played 1 and 2 away. If we'd had return games we might have finished top.

Best home and away team is meaningless. Richmond was the best team. Period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Only played 1 and 2 away. If we'd had return games we might have finished top.

Best home and away team is meaningless. Richmond was the best team. Period.
Yeh, you make valid points.

A points decision to spook over TBR. Maybe a TKO.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
The Crows beat us in Adelaide at the start of May after both sides had begun 5-0. After that game, they won 11 of 19 for the rest of the year. We won 14, and of the 5 we lost, 3 were by less than a kick (2 of which you could argue we were robbed) and 1 was by 2-3 goals away to a top-4 side with the biggest home ground advantage in the comp, when we played *smile*. We finished the regular season third, half a game behind the Crows and Cats - both of whom beat us at their home grounds, but neither of whom we got to play at ours. We then beat the other 3 top-4 sides in September by 51, 36 and 48. If we weren't the best team in the comp, who the hell was?

We were head and shoulders the best team in the comp, as we were for the next 3 years. Most acknowledged us as the best by pretty early in 2018.
Correction, we went 13-6 after R6, with losses by 2, 3, 5, 9, 14, and 67.
 
Worth remembering in 2017 we were playing with one key forward, a wing as a second ruck and playing some weird game style where we got smashed in clearance and then got the ball back. Would have been a brave pundit to call a dynasty. :ROFLMAO:

Be an even braver pundit to call Melbourne a dynasty after 1 flag, not that they are but there is talk that this could be the start of a dynasty.

Let's just say that the difference between the Richmond 2017 and Melbourne 2021 teams is not a large as the difference in the hype and comments about each team following the winning a flag after decades of mediocrity.

The talk of a possible dynasty for Melbourne after 2021 is not unreasonable, they're bloody good.

But talk of the worst premiership team and virtually nothing on whether we could get more flags after 2017, yeah, looks pretty silly now.

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user