Reece Conca - so long and thanks for all the fish | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Reece Conca - so long and thanks for all the fish

Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

Jason King said:
Wondering whether Reece would have slipped to our second pick ? I know its all hindsight, but was anyone else genuinely interested in Reece ?

Freo have said that they would have taken him with their 1st pick
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

Everyone has said they don't mind the selection of Conca, but keep on mentioning Heppell as a preferred choice.
I think due our lack of big bodied footballers that Darling should've been our 1st selection and then if Atley or Conca were around for our 2nd selection all well and good.
We need to recruit players that can win a contested ball, either On the ground or more importantly in the air.
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

JR8 said:
Doesnt have much to beat.

That was a bit tongue in cheek but I do rate Reece very highly, seems to have that time and space which is the hallmark of some of the best mids in the game. I don't want to give him the kiss of death but I see a bit of Matty Knights in his play, in due course I reckon we'll be veiwing Conca versus Heppell like we have with Riewoldt versus Frawley or Vickery versus Ziebell / Sidebottom.
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

Barnzy said:
Nope. She had him at #23 in her talent rankings which is where she rates them not where she thinks they will be picked based on the rumours and what she hears.

We were talking about where he would've gone had we not picked him. Given she reckons the GC were taking him at 9, 10, 11 or 13 I reckon "nope" should've been "yep" Jimmy.
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

Hepple had a bad case of op last season which may have put some clubs off. I belive the question will be asked in the future Polec before Conca and Hepple what were Brisbane thinking?
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

zippadeee said:
Everyone has said they don't mind the selection of Conca, but keep on mentioning Heppell as a preferred choice.
I think due our lack of big bodied footballers that Darling should've been our 1st selection and then if Atley or Conca were around for our 2nd selection all well and good.
We need to recruit players that can win a contested ball, either On the ground or more importantly in the air.
Saw Darling on weekend and his big body was the first thing that struck me and wondered why we did not go for that type.
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

ROLLS ROYCE said:
Saw Darling on weekend and his big body was the first thing that struck me and wondered why we did not go for that type.
We couldn't see past his tanking last year!
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

yandb said:
Hepple had a bad case of op last season which may have put some clubs off. I belive the question will be asked in the future Polec before Conca and Hepple what were Brisbane thinking?

Hep, had slight OP, it was blown out of all proportion.

And Polec will be a damn fine footballer. Nothing to worry about there.
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

Some question marks on Polec for leysy Scooper.

Was actually very glad he wasnt available at our pick.
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

Same here. No rational reasoning for it, just the highlights and one game I saw of him didn't do it for me.
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

People seem to have short memories. Reeces early season form was right up there with others like Heppel, Shuey, Swallow etc.

His first game in the AFL in front of 80K, he managed to pick up 15 possessions, 6 marks and keep Garlett to just 9 touches.

Its no coincidence that the lack of pre-season has caught up with Reece as the year has gone on.

I have no doubt he will be a very good player for us.
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

Still think the club got this one wrong AGAIN. We had a chance to grab a Pendlebury but instead got a Cassisi.

I'd rather it was Heppel. Conca will be a good ordinary player, whereas Heppell has the makings of a superstar. That is where we keep getting it wrong.

We try and pluck out these interesting selections as if to show everyone we know better. We all know how well that has panned out over the years.

Don't get me wrong, atleast we didn't grab a JON but we could have done better.
 
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca

Smoking Aces said:
People seem to have short memories. Reeces early season form was right up there with others like Heppel, Shuey, Swallow etc.

His first game in the AFL in front of 80K, he managed to pick up 15 possessions, 6 marks and keep Garlett to just 9 touches.

Its no coincidence that the lack of pre-season has caught up with Reece as the year has gone on.

I have no doubt he will be a very good player for us.
What he said ^^^