Reece Conca - so long and thanks for all the fish | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Reece Conca - so long and thanks for all the fish

Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

Brodders17 said:
it what the haters are saying, but look at the replay and you will see Conca was not lined up on Gresham for a single goal.

Perhaps that was the problem
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

MD Jazz said:
Reece is getting 8 contested possessions a game. He is a bigger body so maybe he’s creating a bit of space as well, his contested ball numbers aren’t big for an inside mid.

Understand the reasons miles does not get a game. It’s a pity as he’s a terrific footballer.
The 'contested possessions' stat they count is actually 'disposals from contested possession'. There are countless packs in every game in which no one is credited with a disposal, but plenty of possession is being contested. It's not glamorous, but valuable to force a stoppage when you're outnumbered.

SCOOP said:
Struggles to be smart with the ball, got towelled by Gresham for extended periods but still has defenders.
Sure it wasn't Short getting toweled by Gresham?

Amazed that someone who has banged on about midfield depth for years doesn't see the value in Conca. He's flawed, sure. Who else we got?

tigerlove said:
I think this is a little over-played. There is no doubt Miles spread is not the best but when you're being asked to play purely inside mid and extract then this area is going to suffer. A couple of VFL games ago Miles was given instruction to spread more and found himself receiving a lot of ball in the forward half. He's been working on it and I personally can't see the negative in playing him ahead of a couple of others getting games. We were smashed in the midfield to half way through the third quarter. Last year against the Suns he had 23 disposals, 13 contested, 8 tackles, 8 clearances, an 82% disposal efficiency rating in only 75% game time. Played 66% the next game and then was dropped. I am however resigned that Miles won't get a game unless say both Cotchin or Martin are out.
No one is asked to play purely inside mid. More to the point, no one is allowed to, in our side. Because the ball is outside way more than it is in, even in today's congested game. Miles can use his smarts to find space to get a kick, but he cannot keep up when the baddies have the ball.
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

I'm a fan of Conca, but his decision making yesterday really frustrated me.
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

The sooner he is out of this team the better. He ain't going to cbange after all these year's
He butchers the ball nearly every time he touches it.
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

fastin bulbous said:
Who else we got spook?!!! MILES!!
If you read that post you read why I think we don't have Miles. Well, we have him... ;D
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

lamb22 said:
Spoken like a true fanboi. Just a quick perusal of my posts on the last few pages of this thread exposes the nonsense of your post.

The old dismiss someone who disagrees with you by calling them a fanboi trick. That's the third time I've fallen for that this month.
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

Reecy was 50% of the match saving move yesterday.

Vlastuin went forward, reecy covered vlastuin.

What other mid caN do that? Dusty? Cotchy? dion to the HBF?

Um, nuh. Reecy gives us grunt and flexibility.

I thought id do a series of tips for Reecy haters to

Spice up their footy knowledge a bit.

Handy tip # 1. BaKe some little written reminders into some muffins

And put them in your lunchbox. Youlle be surprised when you bite into a muffin at smoko and a little bit of paper with

'Reecy is best 22 easily' appears. Gaurenteed to really spice up your knowledge of this tiger outfit.

tip #2 tomorrow.
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

easy said:
Reecy was 50% of the match saving move yesterday.

Vlastuin went forward, reecy covered vlastuin.

What other mid caN do that? Dusty? Cotchy? dion to the HBF?

Um, nuh. Reecy gives us grunt and flexibility.

I thought id do a series of tips for Reecy haters to

Spice up their footy knowledge a bit.

Handy tip # 1. BaKe some little written reminders into some muffins

And put them in your lunchbox. Youlle be surprised when you bite into a muffin at smoko and a little bit of paper with

'Reecy is best 22 easily' appears. Gaurenteed to really spice up your knowledge of this tiger outfit.

tip #2 tomorrow.

Nope. It was McIntosh who went back when Vlastuin went forward
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

tigersnake said:
The old dismiss someone who disagrees with you by calling them a fanboi trick. That's the third time I've fallen for that this month.

It's not a question of disagreeing Snakey. It's a question of you misrepresenting my criticism of Conca. I know what he brings but he is blessed in the fact that those qualities get him a game ahead of better offensive players. Good luck to him.

However you sticking your head in the sand in relation to his obvious deficiencies is simply fanboiism!
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

The best position for conca is half back for the Dockers
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

lukeanddad said:
Nope. It was McIntosh who went back when Vlastuin went forward

pretty sure I saw Reecy back there a fair bit, on the wireless
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

easy said:
pretty sure I saw Reecy back there a fair bit, on the wireless

You'll have to get a digital radio easy, those wirelesses are worth a cup full of cold water ;)
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

lamb22 said:
It's not a question of disagreeing Snakey. It's a question of you misrepresenting my criticism of Conca. I know what he brings but he is blessed in the fact that those qualities get him a game ahead of better offensive players. Good luck to him.

However you sticking your head in the sand in relation to his obvious deficiencies is simply fanboiism!

No head sticking, I'm aware of his deficiencies, but I'm also aware of his strengths and place a premium on them. And the term fanboi is obnoxious Internet trollism. I'm a fan of Conca, everybody knows it. Back in 16 his confidence was shot and I thought he was gone and said so.
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

tigerman said:
You'll have to get a digital radio easy, those wirelesses are worth a cup full of cold water ;)

I'll never relinquish my tranny.

or do I have to call her a BLT these days?
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

easy said:
I'll never relinquish my tranny.

or do I have to call her a BLT these days?

Bacon, lettuce, tomato? Am I missing something obvious? Gee I am getting old.
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

spook said:
Sure it wasn't Short getting toweled by Gresham?

Amazed that someone who has banged on about midfield depth for years doesn't see the value in Conca. He's flawed, sure. Who else we got?

Conca had him for large portions of the last half. And midfield depth? Not sure Conca is spending that much time there. Would like to see that split. For his current role play Markov.
 
Re: Reece "2018 Whipping Boy" Conca

SCOOP said:
Conca had him for large portions of the last half. And midfield depth? Not sure Conca is spending that much time there. Would like to see that split. For his current role play Markov.
Did he? I watched the replay this arvo - Short was on Gresham for his first two goals, Ellis his third, Broad his fourth, Lambert his fifth and McIntosh his sixth.

Conca is playing plenty of midfield time, has all season. It's good that one of our depth mids can help shoulder the load while Prestia is out and Martin is merely brilliant instead of superhuman. Part of the reason we're 8-2.