Re: Adam Goodes | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Re: Adam Goodes

rosy23 said:
That means it was a failure on Adam's behalf then because he said it was a war cry and supposed to intimidate the crowd.

Got a link to what he said? Cause what I find him saying is "There was nothing untoward to the Carlton supporters. It was actually something for them to stand up and go, 'yep we see you, and we acknowledge you - bring it on."
 
IanG said:
No name put to it go to profile and there's no name, if he identifies himself elsewhere how am I supposed to know.

Because if you read what Rosy posted you would have seen who wrote it.
 
lukeanddad said:
No amount of sophistry by liberals will change this perception.
Arguments that the booing isn't materially due to racism is not sophistry.

In any case this is a different issue to the question of perception. I don't recall anyone disputing that many people have bought into the booing is racist argument.

lukeanddad said:
No white person can tell a person of a different color how to behave if they want their message heard.
I would put it this way: No person can tell another person how to behave if they want their message heard.
 
rosy23 said:
Could you edit and include a link please antman.

That speech has been discussed on here. I don't recall anyone disagreeing with it. It was obviously a scripted speech for a specific occasion and great consideration was given to the wording. Why are people on here focusing on it?

Link added, thanks Rosy.

Why do you feel that scripted speeches are not important? His agenda is pretty clear to me and all his actions support this agenda, whether scripted or not.

Here's my understanding of Adam's position.

1. He considers himself Australian like the rest of us.

2. He is proud of his indigenous heritage but it doesn't make him any less Australian or think less of other Australians of different backgrounds.
3. He wants us all of whatever colour/race/religion to get along. He doesn't care if you are white/black/Greek/Maco/Lebanese Australian - as long as we can respect each other.

4. He wants us as a society to consider the situation of indigenous Australians and actively work towards improving that condition - of course this applies to himself and other indigenous Australians which is why he has spent a lot of personal time working with indigenous groups - for example working with indigenous youth in detention centres.

5. As part of this, he wants us all to stand up against racism and division. He has made a personal commitment to do so himself. If we think racism is bad, we need to stand up and say so. No more sitting down, feeling bad inside but doing nothing about it.

I've never been a big Goodes fan on the footy field - particularly in his later years with staging and occasional sniping. But this has gone way beyond what I think of him as a player now. It's a bigger issue and has exposed how racism is not just a conscious act but is tied to our basic cultural practices in ways we often don't realise.

We saw a fantastic reaction from all AFL clubs and players yesterday. Jetta, Thomas, Nathan Jones, Richmond FC - both black and white players who have spent a lot of time with indigenous colleagues, more than most of us have, stood up, kissed their aboriginal flags, did their aboriginal dances, kissed their black/gold/red wrist bands. They feel it. They know it.

Now you can keep on pretending that it's not about race, it's just about football or that you just don't like Goodes' personality or "the way he goes about it". That's up to you.

But I stand with Adam Goodes.

#istandwithadam
 
Giardiasis said:
I agree with this, and it is why I think the booing will stop. The unfortunate thing is that the reason for it is because a lot of people have bought into the false assertion that booing AG is racist. So instead of getting to the truth of the matter, we fall back into thinking about people as races, and not as human beings.
I know you didn't say that I was responsible for those crimes, what you did say was that I represent the part of Australian society who was responsible. So can you please explain why I represent that?

Its not a false assertion. Regardless of how much earnest dogma you trot out.
 
Giardiasis said:
Arguments that the booing isn't materially due to racism is not sophistry.

Yeah ... it is sophistry.

antman said:
We saw a fantastic reaction from all AFL clubs and players yesterday. Jetta, Thomas, Nathan Jones, Richmond FC - both black and white players who have spent a lot of time with indigenous colleagues, more than most of us have, stood up, kissed their aboriginal flags, did their aboriginal dances, kissed their black/gold/red wrist bands. They feel it. They know it.

Now you can keep on pretending that it's not about race, it's just about football or that you just don't like Goodes' personality or "the way he goes about it". That's up to you.

But I stand with Adam Goodes.

#istandwithadam

... it's that simple.

We can all make a choice.
 
tigersnake said:
Its not a false assertion. Regardless of how much earnest dogma you trot out.
That's the funny thing, I'm using argumentative logic as the basis of my reasoning, and you accuse me of dogma? Ok, let's concede it is dogma. Is that actually the important point? The correctness of the argument is of most importance I would have thought no?
 
bruntonave. said:
Yeah ... it is sophistry.
noun, plural sophistries.
1.
a subtle, tricky, superficially plausible, but generally fallacious method of reasoning.
2.
a false argument; sophism.

Using the association fallacy is by definition, sophistry.
 
Giardiasis said:
noun, plural sophistries.
1.
a subtle, tricky, superficially plausible, but generally fallacious method of reasoning.
2.
a false argument; sophism.

Yep. That's what all the drivel defending the booing and attacking Goodes sounds like.
 
IanG said:
Fair enough

So if you thought it worthy of pointing out (incorrectly) that the blog was written by an anonymous person does it change things when your claim was wrong. Just wondering what your point about the anonymity was.
 
antman said:
........
3. He wants us all of whatever colour/race/religion to get along. He doesn't care if you are white/black/Greek/Maco/Lebanese Australian - as long as we can respect each other.

....

5. As part of this, he wants us all to stand up against racism and division. He has made a personal commitment to do so himself. If we think racism is bad, we need to stand up and say so. No more sitting down, feeling bad inside but doing nothing about it.

........

So why deliberately try to intimidate the crowd with a taunt he wouldn't do to the opposition with another Indigenous Australian?

He has failed bigtime if he is standing up to division yet behaving the way he has.

Pretending to spear people is barbaric behaviour...if white people pretended to shoot him with a shot gun I'd think the same. Both behaviours of primitive and violent people many years ago. Nott a bit relevant to games of football now.
 
rosy23 said:
So if you thought it worthy of pointing out (incorrectly) that the blog was written by an anonymous person does it change things when your claim was wrong. Just wondering what your point about the anonymity was.

he still misrepresented the events.
 
IanG said:
he still misrepresented the events.

Funny. You must have included the anonymous claim for a reason.

Can you please elaborate in regards to the misrepresented events.
 
I find people who try to use the "he threw a spear at us" argument so laughable. No matter how eloquently your argument is made, it just sounds ridiculous.

You must be so scared of so many things. I hope your kids never played with pretend guns when they were little......
 
rosy23 said:
So why deliberately try to intimidate the crowd with a taunt he wouldn't do to the opposition with another Indigenous Australian?

He has failed bigtime if he is standing up to division yet behaving the way he has.

Pretending to spear people is barbaric behaviour...if white people pretended to shoot him with a shot gun I'd think the same. Both behaviours of primitive and violent people many years ago. Nott a bit relevant to games of football now.

I'm not going to play the little game of arguing about whether a dance involving a simulated spear throw is "barbaric". It's trivia, minutiae in the scheme of the debate. He stood up the crowd that was booing him using cultural expression do to so. You are offended, big deal.

Why do you think all other teams and many other players are standing with him now? Why do you think the majority of fans are now applauding him and showing respect?

I would suggest it's because the majority is now saying enough is enough. We've all had fun booing him because we don't like the way he plays, we don't like that he brings politics into sport and some of don't like him because he's an outspoken aboriginal man. There is a spectrum. But, it's enough. Time to stop.

I'm proud of the club that I love taking this stand with Adam and support them 100% - along with the players and crowds from other games who supported him yesterday.

ivanedwardsdtmain.jpg


I stand with Shed, Ivan and Adam.

Where do you stand?