Chelsea said:I don't see any reason why they should feel otherwise.
Up until the last year or so, Adam Goodes had made himself a rich man with a good standing in the game. He had won medals and been involved in premierships.
There was no animosity shown towards him over his career and I am sure if there was, then Adam would have been the first to comment.
Did we as a community accept and tolerate Adam Goodes?
My answer is yes. You would have to ask Adam Goodes himself as to whether he felt tolerated and included up until circa 2013 though.
I cannot guess or assume what he felt but he did not seem unhappy and was performing well on the field also.
As he got older then he changed the way he played the game. He seemed more angry or frustrated and started to become nasty.
This is when I first started to dislike him and on occasion, boo him.
Dermie and Aker are two former players who understand what the fans are trying to say. It is a shame many others in the media would rather tow the party line and ignore what the masses are saying.
No, I cannot assume or guess what current day players are feeling however I do understand that there are pressures on individual players to make sure they don't say anything that could be deemed inflammatory as it could be used against them as an individual or against the team later on. The AFL may also step in depending on what they say and the PC brigade would never let the player survive. It is just not worth it.
Very similar to the drugs saga. Nothing to see there either until people dig deeper and there are players in clubs left right and centre taking and dealing in the stuff.
like a lot of other players in the history of the game there's no doubt some poor things have crept into Adam's play, not unusual for older players and not to be excused.
No way known though it has warranted the relentless & obscene amount of booing and bulling he's received though. It's been disproportionate and leads to questions why.
That's why the race issue has come to the fore.