Baloo said:
I think the opposite. I think this in time will be seen as another moment where as a nation we become more tolerant. Short term pain for long term gain.
And as victimised as you may feel for being accused of supporting an activity that is seen as racism now, I don't think anyone is taking it as hard as Goodes himself is.
Read Rob Muphy's column in the age. A very good writer with a good feel for the game. See what he thinks about all this. But then you could dismiss it as PC *smile* and towing the line which I think is a cop out.
I think we were already very tolerant.
To have a round of football to celebrate indigenous footballers only. To have an indigenous centre at our club.
To have indigenous players be treated equally in our teams. To have indigenous captains lead teams.
I go to the football a lot and have no heard any racist abuse from the crowd for many years.
Adam Goodes is a footballer.
People would have tolerated and probably admired his war dance if he chose to do it at the opposition he was playing.
He chose to use it towards opposition fans instead. There was always going to be a backlash there.
I know if an indigenous player ran towards the Richmond Cheer Squad with a provocative dance aimed at them and an invisible spear thrown in their direction, I am just about certain they would not stay seated and clap enthusiastically.
What could the fans do to sdhow their disapproval in this case?
I would stand a boo.
That's not racist. That's all I could do within the law to say no, I do not like you.
As for Robert Murphy. Name one footballer or footballing journalist who has said, no Adam you are wrong?
Everyone is scared. The PC brigade will run anybody out of town who shows any dissent and sides with the everyday Joe Bloggs in the crowd.