rosy23 said:I don't like the Haka either
Why not?
All New Zealanders do it, Maori AND Pakeha.
rosy23 said:I don't like the Haka either
bruntonave. said:For those who 'disagree with his politics', what's the other side of the argument?
He wants to group people based on the colour of their skin, and use government coercion to benefit one of these groups. Personally I think everyone should be viewed the same way, and receive no government redistribution based on the colour of their skin.bruntonave. said:For those who 'disagree with his politics', what's the other side of the argument?
Tony Braxton-Hicks said:So who is going to be booing Gibson on Friday for punching opponents behind the play in previous matches?
Who is going to be booing Sam Mitchell for kneeing key opposition players in previous matches?
Tony Braxton-Hicks said:So who is going to be booing Gibson on Friday for punching opponents behind the play in previous matches?
Who is going to be booing Sam Mitchell for kneeing key opposition players in previous matches?
Chimptastic said:I think it's Adam's general attitude of disgust towards the Australian public that has most inflamed the booing by opposition supporters.
bruntonave. said:Indigenous australians ARE Australians.
IanG said:What attitude of disgust?
What do you think of Richmonds stand?
Chimptastic said:Adam's attitude can be seen in his interviews and speeches. There's little love in those speeches. Other Indigenous rights activists are universally loved and admired, so people certainly don't dislike him because of his decision to make a stand.
bruntonave. said:And I'm not your pal.
IanG said:Read the AOTY speech, it is in no way like that.
Chimptastic said:Listen to Martin Luther King give a speech, then listen to Adam Goodes give a speech. Adam clearly lacks the refined skills necessary for leading these issues. He comes across as an absolute flog who hates Australia.
Giardiasis said:He wants to group people based on the colour of their skin, and use government coercion to benefit one of these groups. Personally I think everyone should be viewed the same way, and receive no government redistribution based on the colour of their skin.
Baloo said:Once the equality is there then it's time to stop the racial divide and treat everyone the same. The US did this some time back and while there are still racial issues, the African American popultion are pretty much integrated and confident enough to not need an African American round of sport or have an African American representative team (that I know of).
LeeToRainesToRoach said:There are probably closer parallels between Aboriginals and American Indians.
Baloo said:Goodes is more in the Malcolm X confrontational approach rather than the Luther King approach. Every movement needs both to succeed. Good Cop Bad Cop if you will.
Chimptastic said:His personal attitude is clearer when he hasn't pre-written something (likely with the help of friends). Subsequent interviews have probably incited most of the reaction.
When you say "we kept them separated" and "we considered", who are you referring to? Last time I checked, I did no such thing. I dare say the vast majority of Australians have nothing to do with that either.Baloo said:If the indigenous population where living as equals I'd agree. But as we kept them seperated for much of our history and it wasn't until the 60s and 70s that we gave them full rights, we need to do what we have to to help them catch up. It wasn't even a generation ago that we considered Abos are a lower class of human.
Once the equality is there then it's time to stop the racial divide and treat everyone the same. The US did this some time back and while there are still racial issues, the African American popultion are pretty much integrated and confident enough to not need an African American round of sport or have an African American representative team (that I know of).
To get to wghere you want, i.e. no government interference, you need government interference. What a conundrum.