Certainly can get it & as a genuine inside mid would address our clearances. However so too would some of our current injured players. (Soldo, Prestia)
29 next year as an inside mid probably has 2-3 years left of decent footy assuming he doesn't get injured.
Right price is late first rounder or early second rounder.
Would I go in that direction given the way Melbourne played this year? Probably not.
Transition mids are the future.
I'm not entirely against the idea at the right price.Prestia is a warrior, he just can't go through an entire season without getting injured.
If we lose Martin, Edwards or Cotchin during the season,
Bottom 6.
Why go into another season knowing our clearance numbers are horrific.
Don't patch over the problem, FiX it.
What are they going to go draft 6 new kids, cross there fingers 1 can play, meanwhile Jack, Grimes and Cotchin will be gone.
Go now.
We need a Mark Couglan clone
4 in 6I'm not entirely against the idea at the right price.
I don’t want to do it - but you make very good points.Prestia is a warrior, he just can't go through an entire season without getting injured.
If we lose Martin, Edwards or Cotchin during the season,
Bottom 6.
Why go into another season knowing our clearance numbers are horrific.
Don't patch over the problem, FiX it.
What are they going to go draft 6 new kids, cross there fingers 1 can play, meanwhile Jack, Grimes and Cotchin will be gone.
Go now.
We need a Mark Couglan clone
Haha I don't know how anyone votes 'no' when the title says 'if the price if right'. That price may be a late draft pick and a salary split. So that means if you vote no, you don't rate Mitchell at all, which is erm...interesting.
Dawks have plenty of cap room. Think the only way they could get a first round pick is by paying some of his salary.I think it is less about the cost in terms of draft picks and more about the cost in terms of salary cap space, which, of course, I don't know the details.
DS