Political correctness & other nonsensical rubbish | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Political correctness & other nonsensical rubbish

You don't think the chemicals released by the brain during sex have any natural function? You don't think that a healthy sex life is a key to good relationships?

If the only purpose of sex feeling good was to make us want to have sex all the time then the planet would be overpopulated in no time flat.
 
Disco08 said:
You don't think the chemicals released by the brain during sex have any natural function? You don't think that a healthy sex life is a key to good relationships?

Like I just stated on my last post:

The first and foremost purpose is reproduction.
All the other things such as 'feeling good', etc are bonuses to make us want to do it again, so we reproduce again

Disco08 said:
If the only purpose of sex feeling good was to make us want to have sex all the time then the planet would be overpopulated in no time flat.

That is when the brain kicks in and people think about responsibilities, financial support, and all the other outside influences which determine whether bringing a baby into the world would be a good thing or not.
 
So, even if reproduction is the main function of sex, these other 'bonuses' are clearly natural aren't they? Doesn't it follow that if people are smart enough to know when they can't have a child but still want to have sex for the bonuses (lol) that is still natural? Therefore wouldn't all types of sexual acts that produce these bonuses be deemed natural?
 
Disco08 said:
So, even if reproduction is the main function of sex, these other 'bonuses' are clearly natural aren't they?

Sure...but why did nature give us the 'bonuses' for do you think?

Disco08 said:
Doesn't it follow that if people are smart enough to know when they can't have a child but still want to have sex for the bonuses (lol) that is still natural?

Sure...but why did nature give us the 'bonuses' for do you think?

Disco08 said:
Therefore wouldn't all types of sexual acts that produce these bonuses be deemed natural?

No.
And I'll ask you this question.....why do homosexual men ejaculate sperm for then, if their sex is natural?
 
Liverpool said:
Sure...but why did nature give us the 'bonuses' for do you think?

The need to breed is inbred into all animals, why would humans (and their ancestors) be the only ones that need incentive to do it?

The other benefits of a good sex life are clearly the product of evolution, both social and physical.

Liverpool said:
No.
And I'll ask you this question.....why do homosexual men ejaculate sperm for then, if their sex is natural?

Ejaculation is completely irrelevant in any case where the couple aren't aiming to produce a child but this doesn't mean people should only have sex when this is their aim.
 
Disco08 said:
Ejaculation is completely irrelevant in any case where the couple aren't aiming to produce a child but this doesn't mean people should only have sex when this is their aim.

It isn't irrelevant at all!
If homosexual sex is natural....why do homosexuals release sperm for then?
 
It's like talking to a child.

Liverpool said:
Did you copy and past that from Wikipedia? :spin :hihi

If I didn't know what it was how could I find it?

Liverpool said:
Why do they have testicles or sperm at all then?

Because they're central to the bonuses.
 
Disco08 said:
It's like talking to a child.
If I didn't know what it was how could I find it?
Because they're central to the bonuses.

Not at all....just semen would be enough to reduce their 'vasocongenstion'.....so what do they need sperm for?
 
Because it doesn't know how to distinguish between heterosexuals and homosexuals.
 
Disco08 said:
Because it doesn't know how to distinguish between heterosexuals and homosexuals.

Of course nature did.
Enter women....and their anatomy and reproductive organs.....which, surprise, surprise...they have an anatomy which interlocks with a male anatomy.
Funny nature knew how to do that... ;)
 
I thought we already agreed that sex has other functions aside from reproduction?
 
Disco08 said:
I thought we already agreed that sex has other functions aside from reproduction?

It's like talking to a child....

The main reason for sex is to reproduce.
That is nature's way of keeping the race going.

I'm not interested in the 'other functions'...they are purely there as an incentive to want to have sex...with the main reason being to reproduce.
That is why we have males and females.....not males and males.

Remember the old saying...."God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve"... :hihi
 
Disco08 said:
That's convenient. We're all part of nature you know.

Really?
So why was I howled down when I used the term "beastiality" in a previous post then? why is it illegal do you think if "we're all part of nature'?

Come on Disco.....give up mate....you can't fight biology, science, facts, and anatomy.
Nature intended us blokes to mate with women.
Don't let your moralistic views cloud simple logic and nature. :)