Political correctness & other nonsensical rubbish | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Political correctness & other nonsensical rubbish

Six Pack said:
What i find disgusting about you Livers is encapsulated in that post.
Read it again.
You try and come across as all reasonable and liberal, and then you have a final crack at gays for being unnatural and abnormal.
It's sickening.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should read it again Sixpack...especially this line you obviously find "sickening":

Liverpool said:
I'm not banning them from having sex with other blokes....I'm not calling for them to be beheaded or burnt at the stake....so why don't they just leave people alone with their unnatural act and get on with it?
Click to expand...

Nothing sickening about stating the obvious, Sixpack.
Get out your sex-ed books from primary school....and take a look at the male anatomy and the female anatomy....and you tell me what piece nature intended to go where.
When you come up with the answer...get back to me... :hihi
 
Liverpool said:
Maybe you should read it again Sixpack...especially this line you obviously find "sickening":

Nothing sickening about stating the obvious, Sixpack.
Get out your sex-ed books from primary school....and take a look at the male anatomy and the female anatomy....and you tell me what piece nature intended to go where.
When you come up with the answer...get back to me... :hihi
Click to expand...

There is that other hole Liverpool...... :hihi
 
As is often the case with the homophobic, their hatred of gays comes down to some sort of ill-defined notion of the sexual act. Livers, just give up on this issue and try and be a better person.
 
Six Pack said:
As is often the case with the homophobic, their hatred of gays comes down to some sort of ill-defined notion of the sexual act. Livers, just give up on this issue and try and be a better person.
Click to expand...

Nothing homophobic about it.....I've stated many times already that I don't care what people do....I'm certainly not calling for bannings, beheadings, or burning at stakes.
So there is no hatred at all from me.

But I stand by the fact that a sexual act between two men is "unnatural".
If you find that sickening, then so be it.
 
Your the one going on about bits connecting with bits is natural. I'm just saying just because some people like some holes and others like others, whats the diff? Both holes are there and accessable
 
Tiger74 said:
Your the one going on about bits connecting with bits is natural. I'm just saying just because some people like some holes and others like others, whats the diff? Both holes are there and accessable
Click to expand...

Whats the difference?
Please Tiger74.....don't make me find that cartoon video they showed us in primary school sex-ed classes with the cartoon bunny rabbits... :hihi

Just because a 'hole is accessible' doesn't make it all of a sudden normal and natural, does it?
What people CHOOSE to do is one thing....what is NATURAL and NORMAL is another.
 
Surely social conditioning determines what is normal or natural when talking of sex. Why else would acceptance of homosexuality be subject to the changing times, or as we speak readily accepted in some societies, frowned upon in others and akin to satanic acts in the more lunatic populations?

Geez, and I thought it was ‘normal’ and 'natural' for all males at one stage in their life to have experienced in some way some form of homosexual feelings. Does this make me unnatural and abnormal? Someone please help! I don’t wanna be a homo!!!

It’s cross species sex where things get a bit tricky. Which reminds me of a good book for all you jazz and cross species sex lovers – ‘The Bear Comes Home’ by Rafi Zabor. Just started it but it's shaping up as a great book!
 
glantone said:
Surely social conditioning determines what is normal or natural when talking of sex. Why else would acceptance of homosexuality be subject to the changing times, or as we speak readily accepted in some societies, frowned upon in others and akin to satanic acts in the more lunatic populations?
Click to expand...

Your so-called "social conditioning" is an outside agenda and why different cultures/countries have different laws regarding homosexuals is based on how many people in positions of power have conformed to these people with outside agendas.

Outside agendas and social conditioning still cannot change the fact that gay sex is unnatural.
 
Liverpool said:
Outside agendas and social conditioning still cannot change the fact that gay sex is unnatural.
Click to expand...

Liverpool,

this is just an opinion but to believe that heterosexual sex is the only natural sex because it continues the species and so by default automatically bars homosexual sex from the nature of things, to me, sounds like some act of faith like believing in god, because without evidence this idea can’t be proven, unless you are privy to some evoluntionary blueprint I am not.

Through the ages a catholic woman having sex with a protestant man was deemed unnatural, a white woman with a black man even more so, same gender sex a perversion of nature.
If these unions were unnatural, where’s the biological backlash?
No-one’s willies have dropped off. Lesbians seem to live as long as the rest of us.

Without some form of evidence how can you be so sure of nature’s perimeters regarding sex?
 
Further to that, sex has more (proven) natural functions than simply reproduction.
 
Disco08 said:
Further to that, sex has more (proven) natural functions than simply reproduction.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it stops ya from going crackers as early as you otherwise would anyway.
 
glantone said:
this is just an opinion but to believe that heterosexual sex is the only natural sex because it continues the species and so by default automatically bars homosexual sex from the nature of things, to me, sounds like some act of faith like believing in god, because without evidence this idea can’t be proven, unless you are privy to some evoluntionary blueprint I am not.

Without some form of evidence how can you be so sure of nature’s perimeters regarding sex?
Click to expand...

That's fine...that is your opinion.
My opinion is nothing to do with faith....it is simple biology and the anatomy of the male and female bodies.

But let me entertain your idea for a minute and ask you a question.

If when men have sex, they ejaculate sperm....which in turn is used to impregnate the ovaries of a female.....why do homosexual men ejaculate sperm for then? What is the logic behind this if homosexual sex is 'natural'?

glantone said:
Through the ages a catholic woman having sex with a protestant man was deemed unnatural, a white woman with a black man even more so, same gender sex a perversion of nature.
If these unions were unnatural, where’s the biological backlash?
No-one’s willies have dropped off. Lesbians seem to live as long as the rest of us.
Click to expand...

The examples you use are simply people's agendas....no different to people's agendas on here trying to tell people that homosexual sex is normal and natural.
I have science, biology, and anatomy on my side whereas the examples you mention didn't...they just had people's opinions and an individual's morals, no different to you, Disco, SixPack, and others on this very topic.
 
Disco08 said:
Livers, do you think sex has any other natural purposes than reproduction?
Click to expand...

The first and foremost purpose is reproduction.
All the other things such as 'feeling good', etc are bonuses to make us want to do it again, so we reproduce again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
< Vic State Election 22 | Banking Royal Commission >
Official PRE merch now on Redbubble!
Top Bottom