the claw said:like i said kick the dog often enough and he will bite.
the claw said:oh cmon mr precious livvers made a joke about a starbucks being blown up it was in relation to another post it was quite clever. i thiught so anyway.
LidsandCotch said:yeah, really funny livers, did you ever stop to think how many people may have died as a result of that explosion?
antman said:So as long as you didn't make or detonate the bomb its funny. :
The axis of idiocy is operating to full effect in this thread.
1eyedtiger said:Was that the result of an Israeli attack Livers? If so, are you going to take it up with them that you deplore their type of violence?
Disco08 said:Pretty pathetic even for you Livers.
1eyedtiger said:There are limits though and Livers crossed that line.
Otis said:anyhow, that youtube clip frightened me. is the english translation accurate or is this a p!ss-take?
Liverpool said:No, because I didn't make or detonate the bomb.
So take your issue with this up with them, the protagonists and people trading in this type of violence.
Listen to all the bleeding hearts.... hihi
I could have picked out any photo with an explosion but because you all jump to a conclusion that people died from this blast (well, did they?) and I have used an actual photo showing Beirut, then its 'crossed the line'.
antman said:What a bleeding heart.
How do you reconcile that statement - with this.
You are one profoundly confused puppy.
Liverpool said:Not at all....I'd do it again and don't take a step back from my comments either.
So what do you think of Hamas' version of the Mickey Mouse Club?
Not seeing many mass protests around the globe denouncing this type of behaviour.... :-X
Freezer said:C'mon Livers - that would be racist.
Liverpool said:Not at all....I'd do it again and don't take a step back from my comments either.
So what do you think of Hamas' version of the Mickey Mouse Club?
Not seeing many mass protests around the globe denouncing this type of behaviour.... :-X
Phantom said:I'm not a Christian.
I don't have to forgive.
antman said:Why don't you start a protest? Oh, that's right, you do your campaigning exclusively on Punt Road End. :
You criticise others for taking a stand on a particular issue but don't have the balls to do anything about anything yourself.
Liverpool said:I'm, not criticising others for 'taking a stand'....I'm criticising others for their blatant hypocrisy and double standards.
If the 'taking a stand' is purely another left-wing anti-USA/Israel popularity protest, which I am most sure it is, then I have every right to criticise these people protesting under false pretenses and using the latest conflict to push their personal political agendas under the guise of "protecting children and civilians".
antman said:Ok then - in that case where is your own condemnation of the slaughter of innocent Palestinian and Lebanese civilians if you claim others are not even handed? Nowhere - instead you choose to make jokes about bombings in Beirut. Try addressing your own hypocrisy and double standards first.
antman said:For some people it is, most definitely. Just as your stance is most assuredly a pro-Israel/pro-US foreign policy stance because that's your own political barrow. Pot, kettle, black.
sheesh talk about head in the sand. in every single conflict the israelis have had to deal with they have ultimately pulled out of taken territory.to their own detriment. they have repeatedly said to stop this current little skirmish hamas only has to stop shelling israel. ya know what if someone bombed australia i would consider it an act of war hamas has in effect declared war i say let it run its course and the winner takes control. the silly thing is israel has always recognised gaza as the palestinians they dont dispute it and make no claim over the land. what they are asking is the palestinians stop useing gaza as a launching pad for war.1eyedtiger said:Livers,
You can call me ableeding heart if you wish. In the context of the current discussion and your dodgy addition of an image of an explosion, you can't blame us if we thought that image was captured in the current conflict. Given the size of the explosion, you can't blame me if I thought that that explosion was the result of an Isreali attack on the Palestinian people. I didn't assume anything, in fact, I asked you if it was.
All I ask is that Isreal withdraws to it's own land and that includes moving it's own people and their wall. They agreed to the lines on the map when Isreal was created and they should stick to it. The fact they haven't and have been ever since provoking the Palistinians by stealing land outside of Israel's borders says something. You say land isn't everything. Maybe so, but if your neighbour decided to rebuild the fence 5 metres into your land, I bet you wouldn't take it lying down. What if your neighbour then decided to restrict your movements in and out of your own property and restricted deliveries of food, water and other vital services?
Livers, if you back someone into a corner, they are going to fight to the bitter end using whatever means they have at their disposal. If Hamas had the same fire power as Isreal, then Isreal would have been sent back to their own country years ago with their tails between their legs.
If Isreal repects it's own borders and Hamas still insists of fighting with them, then maybe Isreal will have more sympathy. Until they do, they get nothing from me.
I think you fail to understand that everyone needs their place in this world. The Jews used this argument to get Israel in the first place. What would you prefer, the Palistinians get a place of their own without Isreal stealing whatever they can get their greedy hands onto or a bunch of refugees in Australia?
well antman what is your stance on hamas bombing israel.i dont see you condemning them for these actions.antman said:Oh God, another Pool essay.
Ok then - in that case where is your own condemnation of the slaughter of innocent Palestinian and Lebanese civilians if you claim others are not even handed? Nowhere - instead you choose to make jokes about bombings in Beirut. Try addressing your own hypocrisy and double standards first.
For some people it is, most definitely. Just as your stance is most assuredly a pro-Israel/pro-US foreign policy stance because that's your own political barrow. Pot, kettle, black.
the claw said:sheesh talk about head in the sand. in every single conflict the israelis have had to deal with they have ultimately pulled out of taken territory.to their own detriment. they have repeatedly said to stop this current little skirmish hamas only has to stop shelling israel. ya know what if someone bombed australia i would consider it an act of war hamas has in effect declared war i say let it run its course and the winner takes control. the silly thing is israel has always recognised gaza as the palestinians they dont dispute it and make no claim over the land. what they are asking is the palestinians stop useing gaza as a launching pad for war.
its as plain as the nose on your face yet dogooders only see one side i dont begrude any country the right to defend itself. i have no doubt that once the israelis cut short the threat to it it will once again pull out of gaza imo they have every right to stay and claim it as spoils of war.