Ah here it is, the justification. I had thought of asking for proof but you have provided what you call proof for me anyway. It is as weak as I thought it would be.No I don’t deny it. I said I own wha5 I write or say.
The context of that was if someone is making excuses for what Hamas did on October 7 is complicit .
The actual statement was.. if some says they don’t condone what Hamas did BUT. The BUT gives it away. Go back and read some more.
Hence if you excuse it, you have sympathy with them. Is that easy enough for you to understand?
No of course I don’t deny it. I said it, I own it. Obviously it’s hard to get through to what that actually means.
More proof you’ve spent some time going back over my posts. Good to see. Now you’ve refreshed your memory and know where to look, you won’t have to make up more lies about what I post
He will grow up with that memory of what an Israeli soldier is.
Yep.Israel tells Gazans to get out of Rafah now, after telling them they had to go there even as they kept bombing Rafah. So, where are they to go, North? Where there is a famine going on? This is genocide.
We know what Israel wants, their "discussion paper" on forcing Palestinians out of Gaza and into Sinai was revealed months ago. The Palestinians should not be expected to leave their land and they know that if they do, they will never get back as Israel takes over and expands its borders.
DS
Thats your opinion. Not mine.Ah here it is, the justification. I had thought of asking for proof but you have provided what you call proof for me anyway. It is as weak as I thought it would be.
Read what I said about BUTNot once have I ever condoned the methods used by Hamas and not once have I ever sought to justify what happened on October 7.
So it all comes down to BUT ??? Are you kidding me?
But what ?
We’ve been through that ad nauseum.But I understand how Hamas exists and how the circumstances of the last 75 years would inevitably create violent resistance? Bloody hell, history of conflicts around the world and history of repression of people around the world will give you that understanding. It has happened over and over again.
No. I understand what Hamas is, what they stand for and what they’ve done.Or maybe it is that I tried to explain to you the difficulty of defining “Hamas ” given that so many Gazans worked for the government and they were the government?
Your opinion. Plenty of people bemoan the Palestinian cause but still manage to both condemn and then make excuses for Hamas actions on October 7.That is not sympathy it is intellectual understanding. It is analysis of the reasons something occurred. You will find multiple posts by me bemoaning how the actions of Hamas has hurt the legitimate cause of the Palestinian people.
Exactly what I said. If you make excuses for Hamas. You’re a Hamas sympathiser.If you think that is being a Hamas sympathiser then I am not sure what to say, it’s such a ridiculous conclusion to come to. I certainly wouldn’t be the only person on this thread who you would say the same thing about and it wouldn’t be true for them as well.
For sure. You make some statements surely I have the right to reply. Especially when you have a question or two amongst it.FFS Willo.
I am sure you will have a line by line rebuke of everything I say as usual.
I knew then exactly what you were doing, trying to provoke others into your posts to respond to me. What a weak boy you are on this thread.
If you want to challenge me or what I write or post about, then do so truthfully and honestly. Don’t lie. . Don’t try to bring others into it.
Try to be mature enough to act as an adult.
You misread. I didn't say sympathetic to a causeYou state
" Just like someone might not be a member of the nazi party, but are sympathetic to their cause and make excuses for what they do"
This is where you fail to understand. Being sympathetic to a cause and making excuses for what they do are not the same thing, they are separate. Seeing you have given an analogy I will as well
Obvious to you. I will say it again. If one sympathises or makes excuses for terrorist group…. NOT the Palestinian cause.If someone attacks and severely injures someone for no reason and the victim's family then responds by killing the perpetrator and members of his family then my reaction is going to be that I have sympathy for their anger for an unprovoked attack but I do not support the actions they have taken in response. This is exactly what people feel about any Palestinian organisation seeking justice for Palestinians i.e. we understand the cause and why they are angry but do not support their actions. I really have no idea why you find this so hard to understand, it is a mystery to me when the logic is so obvious.
What you think you were doing where? I’ve no idea what you’re going on about now.This is childish Willo. I have zero idea what you think I was doing, I've read this a few times and I still have no idea what the hell you are talking about.
As you know, I didn’t post about you at all. David did. Go back and read his post where he mentions your name in a question to me.I responded because you posted about me in a response to David. I have no control over what he writes and doesn't write and nor would I seek to do so. I was quite happy to let you two banter on until you posted about me.
See my reply above. Be honest and call out david for bringing your name up.When you post about me I may well respond.
Mate, I’ve never said everythin* you post is about me. Don’t be like dvisd and start telling lies.but hey, you go on thinking that everything I post is about you. It isn't
You opinion. I gave you mine. And why.I've challenged you plenty of times and I've challenged you again on your ridiculous claim of me being a Hamas sympathiser and you have come up with nonsense...again.
Here is you posting about me in a response to David although I am now Sun (sic)You “haven't all seen them” because it wasn’t what I said.. if you claim it show us all…otherwise you’re just making up lies again.
Both you and Sun should really go back and read what I wrote.
Obviously you both have issues with what I post but that doesn’t give you free rein to write lies.
Try it as a challenge. One you’ll both 100% fail at .
Here is you posting about me again in a response to DavidOh hello, you must have gone back over my previous posts. Just to justify the lies you keep spreading. It didn’t work out for you did it.
No I don’t. Obviously you missed the reply to your previous lie that I called him a terrorist. Which said I hadn’t.
so now we have proof of you lies.
No I don’t deny it. I said I own wha5 I write or say.
The context of that was if someone is making excuses for what Hamas did on October 7 is complicit .
The actual statement was.. if some says they don’t condone what Hamas did BUT. The BUT gives it away. Go back and read some more.
Hence if you excuse it, you have sympathy with them. Is that easy enough for you to understand?
so this is a straight out lie. You posted about me and I replied.As you know, I didn’t post about you at all. David did. Go back and read his post where he mentions your name in a question to me.
I answered his question.
Fully knowing the weak bastard was only doing it to stir the pot after I called him out for telling so many lies.
So if you want to ha=e a go at someone for bringing your name up. Do so with him
Noone is sympathising or making excuses for Hamas, noone has on this thread, certainly not me. I have never excused the actions of October 7 and I never would. Nor do I have any sympathies for their actions, I have consistently said I am against violence.Obvious to you. I will say it again. If one sympathises or makes excuses for terrorist group…. NOT the Palestinian cause.
Whats so hard to understand that?
Huh ? read what this responded to, some nonsensical gibberish about some underhand method I was using or something. I have no idea what you were talking about.What you think you were doing where? I’ve no idea what you’re going on about now. I was asked some questions by David, the provocateur. I answered. You posted. I replied to you.
FFS. I already said your name was mentioned in reply to a question from David who raised itHere is you posting about me in a response to David although I am now Sun (sic)
No *smile*. I already explained it! He brought your name up. NOT ME. As you stated in RESPONSE. I never said I never mentioned you in respons.Here is you posting about me again in a response to David
*smile* me, are you blokes so dense.so this is a straight out lie. You posted about me and I replied.
When a poster says I don’t condone their actions but I can see why they did them (sic). That is making an excuse for them doing so. That demonstrates they think they know the reason why. Which is a *smile* replyNoone is sympathising or making excuses for Hamas, noone has on this thread, certainly not me. I have never excused the actions of October 7 and I never would. Nor do I have any sympathies for their actions, I have consistently said I am against violence.
Yes, no doubt thats what any sane and sensible person would believe.Once again I posted yesterday about the frustration that I feel as a Palestinian rights supporter for their actions, something that I have consistently done from day 1.
Well we’re not and you’re only guessing. A court of what for what? Court of Public Opinion? pro Palestinian Posse court? ICJ? Court of common sense?If you were presenting your evidence in a court of law, you would be laughed out of court.
No, it’s not. In my opinion anyone who makes an excuse or says they know the reason (past injustices in this case) for Hamas atrocities is a Hamas sympathiser. Their is NO reason, there is NO excuse.I know it suits your narrative but your statement is not an opinion, it is a straight out lie.
I did. I stillI haven’t a clue what you’re going on about then or above. Underhand method? I’m non pluses.Huh ? read what this responded to, some nonsensical gibberish about some underhand method I was using or something. I have no idea what you were talking about.
Ah , so I get it. When you post something about me in response to another post it is not posting about me. Of course, how obvious I should have worked that out from the start .... LOLFFS. I already said your name was mentioned in reply to a question from David who raised it
As you stated above. In RESPONSE. Do you know what response means?
No *smile*. I already explained it! He brought your name up. NOT ME. As you stated in RESPONSE. I never said I never mentioned you in respons.
Now read the *smile* post again
*smile* me, are you blokes so dense.
Talk about thick as a brick.
I said I didn’t bring your name up. David did. Can you comprehend that or not?
Except I never said that so your point is moot. I said I understand why Hamas exists, not why they did what they did. I will never understand extreme violence against others.Instead of “I condemn Hamas actions, there is no reason or excuse for them to slaughter 1200 innocent civilians”.instead of “I condemn Hamsas atrocities but because of past injustices I can see why”
“Past injustices and treatment……..yadda yadda” is finding an excuse for their actions.
If you can’t see how one condemns the action totally and one only does partially, shows it all. If you can’t see that it’s not my problem
End of story.
That makes two of us. I have no idea what you are talking about. Noone set anyone up, you posted about me and I replied.I did. I stillI haven’t a clue what you’re going on about then or above. Underhand method? I’m non pluses.
It’s why I try to answer your posts civilly and fully.
Now instead of sooking about me. Take your strident outrage up with David.
He set YOU up perfectly. Knowing you’d get all hot under the collar
Huh ? GibberishNot that you’d care. You have something in common with Hamas, you do whatever you can t9 provoke and don’t give a *smile* who pays for it. Well done to you.
And of course Sin won’t take you to task because he thinks you’re such a humanitarian and I’m a dead *smile* for what I believe and my opinions.
What a sly piece of work. Dishonest and calculating. And your teammates have fallen for it.
Your response was this (below)I knew then exactly what you were doing, trying to provoke others into your posts to respond to me. What a weak boy you are on this thread.
If you want to challenge me or what I write or post about, then do so truthfully and honestly. Don’t lie. . Don’t try to bring others into it.
Try to be mature enough to act as an adult.
That’s where the wires got crossed.This is childish Willo. I have zero idea what you think I was doing, I've read this a few times and I still have no idea what the hell you are talking about. I responded because you posted about me in a response to David. I have no control over what he writes and doesn't write and nor would I seek to do so. I was quite happy to let you two banter on until you posted about me. When you post about me I may well respond.
Come on! You’re being so childish now. I have more respect for you than that.Ah , so I get it. When you post something about me in response to another post it is not posting about me. Of course, how obvious I should have worked that out from the start .... LOL
That’s ok. That’s your POV.Good album Thick as a Brick...big Jethro Tull fan
When I think about it the first line is a good one “ I really don’t mind if you sit this one out, your words but a whisper, your deafness a shout”
Mmmm
Except I never said that so your point is moot. I said I understand why Hamas exists, not why they did what they did.
Well I do. Specific circumstances only. Eg If someone threatened my family or myself.I will never understand extreme violence against others
No, I worked out where the confusion was. That statement was directed at David, not you.That makes two of us. I have no idea what you are talking about. Noone set anyone up, you posted about me and I replied.
Yeah, I can talk gibberish with the best of them. Well sometimes, then other times I’m easily confused.Huh ? Gibberish
Thanks! That’s appreciated. I rest easily with my moral code. If I call someone a Hamas sympathiser it’s for the reasons I gave you. If you believe I’m wrong, that’s ok as wellI'll let you judge your own moral code . Remember you are the one judging here, you are the one calling someone a Hamas sympathiser,
Yeah, poor little K3. It was said in a joking manner. It’s not like others on PRE don’t make up nom de plumes for anyone. Only me. I’m the only one ever to have done it in the history of PRE and I’m sure no one else will ever do it in the future.you are the one calling a poster Muhammed.
Let’s leave it at that.Come on! You’re being so childish now. I have more respect for you than that.
Did you have a shot at David?
That’s ok. That’s your POV.
Well I do. Specific circumstances only. Eg If someone threatened my family or myself.
Not gratuitous violence or against innocent people. It’s an anathema.
No, I worked out where the confusion was. That statement was directed at David, not you.
Hence your confused reply and my confused reply back
Yeah, I can talk gibberish with the best of them. Well sometimes, then other times I’m easily confused.
Thanks! That’s appreciated. I rest easily with my moral code. If I call someone a Hamas sympathiser it’s for the reasons I gave you. If you believe I’m wrong, that’s ok as well
Yeah, poor little K3. It was said in a joking manner. It’s not like others on PRE don’t make up nom de plumes for anyone. Only me. I’m the only one ever to have done it in the history of PRE and I’m sure no one else will ever do it in the future.
Just in case someone finds offence with a nickname. Even though noone uses their true full name. Bloody hilarious what kids get offended by these days. Don’t call someone going by a nickname, another nickname. Honestly you couldn’t make this *smile* up.
But obviously he was offended being called a Muslim name. Maybe some people only like being seen to be Palestinian sympathisers and heaven forbid, not Muslim sympathisers.
I did apologise to him personally, if I did offend him. But I never heard back so I rescinded my apology. I decided if he wasn’t man enough to respond, he didn’t deserve it anyway.