No, you’ve touched nothing. Not a thing.
The truth never hurts if what you say is true, as I have, and stuck to it.
Mumbo jumbo. Pretend the opposite? try writing in English that makes sense
I don’t think so. I’d reply but I couldn’t understand what you were saying I; your previous post.It is a highly emotional issue and your emotions are spilling over.
Good post.Willo, you want to discuss cause and effect. You are right in a way, if the world began on October 7th, then you are right, the cause and effect was that Hamas attacked Israel and Israel fought back. but reality is that the world didn't start on October 7th, and if you want to talk cause and effect, ask why Hamas carried out the attack on October 7th. You don't have to support what Hamas did, I certainly don't, what they did was inhumane and abhorent, but you can still look at the cause and effect, and essentially Israel have been continuing with their expansion plans and frankly before October 7th, no-one gave a *smile* it would seem. Hamas decided to bring notice to this in the most barbaric way.
2023-2024 Hostilities and Escalating Violence in the oPt | Account of Events
This account of events covers the hostilities in Israel and Gaza as well as escalating violence across the oPt in the time period from 7 October 2023 until 7 January 2024.www.diakonia.se
So prior to October 7th, Israel essentially blockaded Gaza, leading to 70% youth unemployment, they participated in the most deadly period in the West Bank in decades and signed a decree to support another 500k Israelis taking land from Palestinians in the West Bank. If you want to talk cause and effect, I think thats clear what Hamas were acting out against. That certainly doesn't mean I support what Hamas did, what they did sickens me, reading what they did to both living and dead bodies sickens me, what they did to women sickens me, but you know what, I understand the catalyst, I also understand the catalyst as to why Israel is fighting back, but they are doing it in an equally inhumane and barbaric way. Just because they endured an inhumane and barbaric act shouldn't mean that they follow it up with the same. I think you mentioned the Munich olympics, so lets remember what happened there. Did they bomb the Palestinians out of spite, without regard for innocent life, nope, what they did was surgically hunt down the perpetrators and execute them. They have the 2nd largest spy network in the world (behind the CIA), are you telling me those spies in Gaza (and they have hundreds if not thousands) couldn't tell them where they were so they could attack them in a more surgical way? Why did they choose this method to attack? There were alternatives so why did they choose this option?
Oooh are we discussing the Wizard of Oz now?? Never did like that scarecrow bloke. Where the *smile* does he get of putting the frighteners up a poor old bunch of hungry crows just trying to get a feed.
No. Hamas shot that fair in the arse. Even if Fatah wanted to sit down and negotiate with Israel, you have the problem of one people and two governments. Those two governments hate and kill each other. So make sense of that if you will
Cause and effect.
If Hamas hadn’t caused it Israel had no reason to invade Gaza.
Just as an aside the death toll in Gaza would be the equivalent of 4.3 million Americans on a population basis.Hey Willo, I feel you've been posting really well throughout (against the wind... haha) using reason devoid of the ideological and emotional responses you've attracted.
Interestingly only a few posters on this website keep bothering to post on this issue. Understandably I guess.
When it comes to war one has to pick a side. And despite written claims to the contrary on this very thread the arguments provided show ample evidence of which side each particular poster is on.
Was reading an article by Pulitzer prize winning journalist Bret Stephens recently who in the NYTimes I think it was pointed out that the 1,200 people Hamas slaughtered on Oct 7 would be the proportionate equivalent of over 30,000 people slaughtered in one day if it had've happened in the US due to their population differential.
Now try to imagine what would an appropriately proportionate response be to a regime breaking a ceasfire in order to murder in cold blood 30,000 people in America, rape and gang rape women, live uploading to victims' families of such rapes for fun, mutilate womens' sexual organs and bodies in general, torture by amputation of childrens' hands and feet in front of parents, torture parents in front of their children, abduct 12 month old babies and over 80 year old men & women, celebrate such abductions by dancing in the Gazan streets etc etc all captured on video so proudly by the Palestinian males who participated in this orgy of barbarism.
I mean what would a proportionate response by the US or any sovereign member state of the United Nations be in those circumstances?
I have no idea what that could be. But it should be applied to Israel.
Oh, ok, that's your logic. Cause and effect: if Israel hadn't occupied Gaza, arrested people without charge, bulldozed peoples' houses, created one great big ghetto and controlled what could go in and out of the territory, chucked Palestinians off their land, etc, etc, etc - then Hamas would have had no reason to attack Israel.
You continue to argue cause and effect for Israel's actions but cannot see that there was a cause for Hamas' actions.
What Hamas did was reprehensible, but the Palestinians were getting ignored and getting nowhere in trying to get some sort of resolution, Israel certainly weren't interested in any resolution, so what should the Palestinians have done?
DS