mb64 said:Cotch said Rance wanted to play on Cloke so he got his way.What about the coaches decide on the matchups,aren't they paid for doing that???
Punxsutawney Phil said:Maybe the players got caught up in the hype. We had a bloody band at training and 5000 people there on Thursday. Ridiculous.
Stylo said:I think it's good in a way that Rance was pleading for his chance to take on Cloke and redeem himself. Shows confidence, character, self awareness
Fantastic & then Cloke kicks 7 goals & we lose.RidiculousStylo said:I think it's good in a way that Rance was pleading for his chance to take on Cloke and redeem himself. Shows confidence, character, self awareness
I was thinking the same....its so much worse :hihiBig Country said:Interesting. I used to hate it when I was in trouble and someone was disappointed with me rather than just being angry. Seemed like it used to stick with you longer. I use it with my kids when all other avenues are exhausted. ;D
mb64 said:Fantastic & then Cloke kicks 7 goals & we lose.Ridiculous
Tigers of Old said:How will his confidence be this week?
Stylo said:Wouldn't be so bad if it were a good band
AstuteTiger said:This quote from Cotchin blew me away and as much as players want to redeem themselves or make amends for past poor performances that there not happy with my jaw dropped listening to Cotchin saying we thought it was fantastic that he (Rance) wanted to put his hand up to play on Cloke...WTF under no circumstance should that sway the coaching panel, Chaplin shoudlve played on Cloke PERIOD.....
Cotchin quote "They were given the option of putting their hand up and wanting to take on the challenge obviously Rancey had been disappointed with his performances in the previous weeks and wanted to show that he was capable of taking on one of the best key forwards in the competition"
GEDS1 said:Why wasnt the lack lustre training addressed at the time ?
mb64 said:Cotch said Rance wanted to play on Cloke so he got his way.What about the coaches decide on the matchups,aren't they paid for doing that???
AstuteTiger said:This quote from Cotchin blew me away and as much as players want to redeem themselves or make amends for past poor performances that there not happy with my jaw dropped listening to Cotchin saying we thought it was fantastic that he (Rance) wanted to put his hand up to play on Cloke...WTF under no circumstance should that sway the coaching panel, Chaplin shoudlve played on Cloke PERIOD.....
Cotchin quote "They were given the option of putting their hand up and wanting to take on the challenge obviously Rancey had been disappointed with his performances in the previous weeks and wanted to show that he was capable of taking on one of the best key forwards in the competition"
Tommo37 said:And what would have been the reaction had Rance kept Cloke to 1 or 2 goals, it's only because Cloke kicked 7 that people question why he was on him after the fact, and if Chaplin had of played on Cloke and had 7 kicked on him the boots would have been out and people saying that Rance should of played on him.