-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Nick Vlastuin
- Thread starter Hungry
- Start date
IMO he gets a very good run on this forum for a first round pick who has never really delivered. None of the talk that we should have taken Grundy instead of him. He is a half back flanker leave him there with the occasional run in the midfield
it's an interesting debate, roar.
the pros - does some very hard and desperate things that make us all go "yep, that's tigger". disposal is neat without being excellent. is good in the air too.
the cons - does he find enough ball? does he have a tank for AFL football?
this latter point has me worried. i'm not just talking about the overall picture, where there are legitimate queries over him running our four quarters as a mid. I'm also seeing a very tired boy after fifteen seconds of frenetic footy in the clinches.
his play by play endurance seems lacking for mine.
the pros - does some very hard and desperate things that make us all go "yep, that's tigger". disposal is neat without being excellent. is good in the air too.
the cons - does he find enough ball? does he have a tank for AFL football?
this latter point has me worried. i'm not just talking about the overall picture, where there are legitimate queries over him running our four quarters as a mid. I'm also seeing a very tired boy after fifteen seconds of frenetic footy in the clinches.
his play by play endurance seems lacking for mine.
Baron have a similar view to above. I like him and hope the club keep him. I remember Dusty when he first started, had tank issues imo. Maybe with new coaches/people at the club they see this too. Not sure but they would have their kpi & requirements for players.Baron Samedi said:
Endurance comes from a lot of kilometres being run & run & run and outside the club trainer requirements. The more they do the more the will benefit. Eg Robert Harvey who still is very good
Flossy is a big out for us. He's been playing forward, midfield and back for us, in that order, in every game.
He's a very valuable swingman who goes where we need him, when we need him. And, aside from forward, he's been very good. Calms things down wherever he goes.
He's a very valuable swingman who goes where we need him, when we need him. And, aside from forward, he's been very good. Calms things down wherever he goes.
Coburgtiger said:
I reckon he is a significant on-field leader. Agree that he will be missed tonight.
Coburgtiger said:
I like vlos too but it will give Markov a game, even though I think they play two different kinds of footy.
Would he be best 22 at GWS??? Very bordeline, for a first round draft pick been very average!
Tonight has been absolutely idiotic. The loss of flossy is massive in terms of footy IQ and composure.
And we bring in Markov.
We have Markov, Menadue, Elton running around brainless, and Lambert and Caddy walking around useless.
Miles had to be the replacement for Flossy. Had to be.
And we bring in Markov.
We have Markov, Menadue, Elton running around brainless, and Lambert and Caddy walking around useless.
Miles had to be the replacement for Flossy. Had to be.
What is he supposed to be again? Wasn't he a HBF as a junior? We need guys who can get more ball that's all I know.
