Waste of time with these d-heads and hourly deliberations. AFL should just make it proper and simple for MRO to do. How hard is this????
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Nankervis !!
- Thread starter Tigaman
- Start date
Stands at 3 matches. Should we appeal?? I suppose Melbourne is the more important match, so leave as is.
3 is about right. If they give him 4 we could appeal, but as I said, if we do, they’ll increase it to 5.
Is this acceptable? Here is what to do everytime this happens.....or is it only for Richmond players??
I’m glad some of our supporters weren’t representing the AFL tribunal.
Stupid, cheap shot, gutless instead of late and careless and probably would have got 8 weeks
Stupid, cheap shot, gutless instead of late and careless and probably would have got 8 weeks
Kane Cornes was saying on Sunday footy show that Nank didn’t show enough remorse, well now we know he did.
And I agree what has that got to do with the length of penalty!
Unlike the MRO to be so lenient on a Richmond player but I will take it. It does say something about the man Nanks is when he puts his hand up and admits he did wrong
Been proven late and careless in a court of law.
I’ll accept their findings
It is kind of ironic to see Richmond assisted by yet another AFL favour to a club other than ours, this time an earlier favour to Collingwood.
Rest well big Nank, and come back vigour intact but maybe a touch more gentle.
Last edited:
