Starting with Danger in the GF. That was far worse.How can it be graded to a fine? Looking at the table it was impossible. Greene will get off at the tribunal citing a squillion precedences.
Geelonghow does Selwood the Repeat Offender not get gone .... ?
it's getting to be transparent now ...Geelong
Pussies are a very clumsy side Nothing to see here as usualhow does Selwood the Repeat Offender not get gone .... ?
Old terminology.why do the call it a Match Review Panel,
when its one bloke?
or is it the Match Review Person?
His choir boy reputation is completely media driven.selwood. unblievable. A lazy, dirty act if ever there was one, formline as long as your arm. Joke, farce, pathetic.
Yeah he’s more like a pimp for a pedo priest. Prick.His choir boy reputation is completely media driven.
In Christian case its The MRDHwhy do the call it a Match Review Panel,
when its one bloke?
or is it the Match Review Person?
sorry to be late, but just saw the Greene/ Danger incident for the first time. Very little diff to the Danger/ Vlastuin incident to my eye, but what do I know? 1 nothing to see, 1 star chamber hanging judges line up. Its a 2-3 week hit in my view. You could argue Danger should have got 3, and you could also argue coz Danger wasn't even cited, Toby shouldn't be also. FARCE.