Marriage Equality | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Marriage Equality

LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Plenty of people don't want to be confronted with what is, by definition, deviancy. In part why I voted no, as I was perfectly entitled to do.
I wouldn't go quite that far. Although I would acknowledge there does seem to be huge double standards developing. Where if a gay man were to engage in certain acts in public, anyone frowning upon it is thought of as a intolerant bigot. But a straight man engaging in similar behaviour would be (rightly by the way) considered the dirtiest perve in the world.
 
jb03 said:
Geez T-Force, that is a bizarre post even by your standards

Just stating what happened jimbob. Started OK, they kissed each other on the lips a few times.....no worries....but the squeezing part was a bit too sleazy.
 
TigerForce said:
Just stating what happened jimbob. Started OK, they kissed each other on the lips a few times.....no worries....but the squeezing part was a bit too sleazy.

Agree. But if it was a couple of lessos that be cool because that's different.
 
Might be a good time to open up a wedding planning business that specialises in same sex marriage.
 
seen a couple of straight drunken late night gropes on the train in my time that we'rent real appetising. One involved a pie in one hand of the bloke.
 
I don't know which made more people smile, the YES verdict or Italy failing to make the World Cup finals. :hihi
 
tigersnake said:
One involved a pie in one hand of the bloke.

Pie-groping Im fine with. Ive got friends who Im pretty sure grope with pie-in-hand sometimes.

They are nice people.

As long as they dont try grope me with a pie, Ive got no problem with it.
 
Baloo said:
Agree. But if it was a couple of lessos that be cool because that's different.
Interestingly Baloo, I did see exactly that on a metro train when backpacking in Boston in the US about 12 years ago. Two girls really going for it on the station platform and continued it once they got on the train. Pretty heavy kissing with much tongue work going on and a fair bit of groping going on too. Plenty of people giving them filthy death stares, with the people showing the most absolute disgust for it generally the African American women on the train - they were the ones audibly expressing their contempt for it.
 
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Plenty of people don't want to be confronted with what is, by definition, deviancy. In part why I voted no, as I was perfectly entitled to do.

I know you are trolling but still.

Homosexuality is no longer classified as illegal or a mental illness (not that it was ever those things but still). And I'm pretty sure mild public displays of affection are accepted as ok (if it was a woman fondling man boob you wouldn't bat an eyelid). So how do you define such behaviour as deviant?
 
Panthera Tigris said:
Sydney is an interesting anlysis.

The safest Liberal, largely wealthy, anglo-saxon electorates, which typically have large chunks of cashed up baby boomers, voted overwhelmingly yes (Warringah being one of them). The multicultural, working class electorates of western Sydney that are the safest of ALP seats (and have come to represent modern Australia), that the political left fawn over, voted strongly no.

It brings me to a related point. This issue has had many more generally leftist activist types piggy backing onto it, using it as a grandstand to convey their wider prejudices. This morning I've seen many comments inferring, "sucked in to the pale, stale old bigots of white Christian baby boomer Australia." When in actual fact, polling continually showed that multi-cultural Australia actually supported SSM in lower numbers than the general populace. But this is an inconvenient truth to the "White-Anglo males, the root of all bigotry in the world" narrative.

100% agree.

These facts are very inconvenient for many I would expect.

Also well done to Tony Abbott for his stand that he made today. It takes courage to do what he is doing.
 
Baloo said:
Not when I was growing up. But yeah, these days it's different. Not too far back I went into a local bank branch with my wife. While waiting she pointed out I was the only anglo saxon in the branch. Everyone else, customers and staff, were of asian descent.

In Melb east suburbs you can easily be in a train carriage with 90% Chinese And Indian ethnic background. Pop mix is changing fast. With both groups very education and achievement focussed will be interesting to see if footy can grab their hearts minds and wallets over the coming decade or will it be a quaint diversion of their adopted country. Judging by the number of satellite dishes around the suburbs I think it's a long battle.
 
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Plenty of people don't want to be confronted with what is, by definition, deviancy. In part why I voted no, as I was perfectly entitled to do.

Deviency? A couple showing affection is deviency?
 
Has the club put anything out? All of the other clubs seem to have posted to social media about the positive outcome.
 
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
deviant

adjective

1 Departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behaviour.


1.5% of the population...

key word there is accepted norms. Norms change. Just because something is a minority does not mean it isn't accepted. Oral sex was once considered deviant behaviour, but I hear that most people are open to giving it a go these days. likewise sexual relations out of wedlock, inter-racial relationships and homosexuality. So by defintion, it isn't deviant anymore. Some conservatives might wish it was, and might think its distasteful or whatever, but by the strict definition, it isn't deviant. And besides its closer to 8%, depending on how you define gay.

also, if we're talking strict definitions, deviant doesn't necessarily mean bad or disgusting or whatever. In regular usage it is often used as meaning bad, but in legal and academic terms it isn't, It just means being outside the bounds of what is considered normal. It can be bad of course, most serial killers are sexual deviants, but it can be harmless, like a shoe fetish, or a four'n'twenty pie fetish.
 
tigersnake said:
key word there is accepted norms. Norms change.

That's at the heart of the survey question: what's acceptable, and should the boundaries be pushed out (and by extension, where does this process end)?. Opinions are going to vary greatly.
 
jb03 said:
Has the club put anything out? All of the other clubs seem to have posted to social media about the positive outcome.

Maybe they were in the no camp.