Marriage Equality | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Marriage Equality

Impressed with the high response rate. Government really cant wriggle away from this.

The electorate where I used to live in Oz, and where my parents still do, voted no. These days I imagine it's an older population than most which might explain the No
 
rosy3 said:
Good and expected. Unbelievable waste of money and resources. They should have had the guts to make a decision in the first place.

Agree, then again why get married anyway? Let's see how the divorce rate compares to the hetero marriages over the years.

Any NO voters need counselling? :hihi
 
Baloo said:
Impressed with the high response rate. Government really cant wriggle away from this.

The electorate where I used to live in Oz, and where my parents still do, voted no. These days I imagine it's an older population than most which might explain the No
If not old, ethnically diverse perhaps?

Data shows the more ethnically diverse the electorate is, the higher the no vote. Particularly look at the western Sydney electorates which are the epicentre of middle eastern Australia.
 
Panthera Tigris said:
Sydney is an interesting anlysis.

The safest Liberal, largely wealthy, anglo-saxon electorates, which typically have large chunks of cashed up baby boomers, voted overwhelmingly yes (Warringah being one of them). The multicultural, working class electorates of western Sydney that are the safest of ALP seats (and have come to represent modern Australia), that the political left fawn over, voted strongly no.

It brings me to a related point. This issue has had many more generally leftist activist types piggy backing onto it, using it as a grandstand to convey their wider prejudices. This morning I've seen many comments inferring, "sucked in to the pale, stale old bigots of white Christian baby boomer Australia." When in actual fact, polling continually showed that multi-cultural Australia actually supported SSM in lower numbers than the general populace. But this is an inconvenient truth to the "White-Anglo males, the root of all bigotry in the world" narrative.

Dont think so. (lot of issues tangled up in the question). Not a surprise to most I wouldn't have thought. Being rich and white, in that order, is more important to the bluebloods than being straight. Plenty of rich white gay people in the liberal party.
 
TigerForce said:
Agree, then again why get married anyway? Let's see how the divorce rate compares to the hetero marriages over the years.

Any NO voters need counselling? :hihi

Marriage is no big deal to me but each to their own.
 
Panthera Tigris said:
If not old, ethnically diverse perhaps?

Data shows the more ethnically diverse the electorate is, the higher the no vote. Particularly look at the western Sydney electorates which are the epicentre of middle eastern Australia.

Not when I was growing up. But yeah, these days it's different. Not too far back I went into a local bank branch with my wife. While waiting she pointed out I was the only anglo saxon in the branch. Everyone else, customers and staff, were of asian descent.
 
tigersnake said:
Dont think so. (lot of issues tangled up in the question). Not a surprise to most I wouldn't have thought. Being rich and white, in that order, is more important to the bluebloods than being straight. Plenty of rich white gay people in the liberal party.
Although, interesting listening to one of the ALP members respond to a question about his (ethnically diverse) western Sydney safe ALP electorate being one of the most strongly opposed. He said he wasn't surprised as it is a socially conservative electorate but realised that just because they disagreed with him on this issue, didn't mean that it was a mean hearted electorate.

Bet you Bob Katter's North Qld electorate that also voted no wouldn't be given the same grace by a politician in the yes side..
 
Fantastic result. But gee the ALP are pissing me off with all the gloating - they had their chance and jibbed it.
 
tigerman said:
Yes gets the nod.

Yay. We are not an entirely intolerant nation.

Great time to be a wedding planner.

can we talk about something important for the next few years?

theres a few topics to choose from.
 
Panthera Tigris said:
Although, interesting listening to one of the ALP members respond to a question about his (ethnically diverse) western Sydney safe ALP electorate being one of the most strongly opposed. He said he wasn't surprised as it is a socially conservative electorate but realised that just because they disagreed with him on this issue, didn't mean that it was a mean hearted electorate.

Bet you Bob Katter's North Qld electorate that also voted no wouldn't be given the same grace by the left.

If we're talking actual sitting politicians like the western Syd example, I'll take that bet.
 
Tigers of Old said:
Indeed a very good result. Many people are happy about this. It can only be a good thing to make society a better place.

Who knows. Few weeks ago, I caught the late train home and noticed 2 or 3 people frown when looking at 2 gay blokes not only kissing each other but also squeezing each other's.....well, let's call it....man-boobs.

I've got nothing against gays and lesos and met many good friends in the past, but geez let's leave the 'sexual acts' out of the public please.
 
TigerForce said:
Who knows. Few weeks ago, I caught the late train home and noticed 2 or 3 people frown when looking at 2 gay blokes not only kissing each other but also squeezing each other's.....well, let's call it....man-boobs.

I've got nothing against gays and lesos and met many good friends in the past, but geez let's leave the 'sexual acts' out of the public please.

Geez T-Force, that is a bizarre post even by your standards
 
jb03 said:
Fantastic result. But gee the ALP are p!ssing me off with all the gloating - they had their chance and jibbed it.
Yes, it’s conveniently looked over my many that Labour didn’t have the guts to make the decision either.

And Penny Wong. Spare me, hypocrite. "On the issue of marriage I think the reality is there is a cultural, religious, historical view around that which we have to respect. The party's position is very clear that this is an institution that is between a man and a woman."
 
jb03 said:
Fantastic result. But gee the ALP are p!ssing me off with all the gloating - they had their chance and jibbed it.

X2.

Yep, a lot of criticism about what the Libs have done with this vote, but they actually did something.

Labour had plenty of time to bring it in, and continued to sweep it under the rug. Only started campaigning for it around election time. Funny that.