rosy23 said:More amused than annoyed but a tad unprofessional of our bank to send out a gift with a 2010-2011 calendar in it. Appreciate the note book just the same.
mainlandy said:The word 'Literally' annoys me like no other. It's a word that does not need to be said but is used in interviews and television relentlessly. If there are hundreds of snakes there are hundreds of snakes not literally hundreds!
Tigers of Old said:I also hate the term 'To be honest'. If someone has to say it occasionally it implies they lie a lot the rest of the time.
Tigers of Old said:Mobile phone batteries only lasting 24 hours or less.
Tigers of Old said:I also hate the term 'To be honest'. If someone has to say it occasionally it implies they lie a lot the rest of the time.
I think what people mean by that is that in this instance they aren't going to allow political correctness make them tell a lie.Tigers of Old said:I also hate the term 'To be honest'. If someone has to say it occasionally it implies they lie a lot the rest of the time.
mainlandy said:I was actually going to post this term TOO, getting very annoyed by it. Steve Smith the other day was asked 2 questions and in those questions he said to be honest 3 times!
TigerForce said:'To be honest' simply means what it says. It just enhances what you realistically mean. I use it a lot. ;D
TigerForce said:'To be honest' simply means what it says. It just enhances what you realistically mean. I use it a lot. ;D
Juffaricho said:It's probably because most people saw he did not lose many contests 1-on-1 or give up poor possession - he simply played a lot of time in the fwd half and we got our butts whipped and they had loose men all day in the back half marking the inside 50 ball. He was not good enough to win 2 on 1's especially when the ball came in poorly. I don't think anyone expects him to be that type of player though to be honest. Personally, I can't make a judgement on any of our fwds play because the ball movement was so bad most of the day.
bullus_hit said:I don't understand all the angst to be honest, we have signaled our intention to invest in the draft because we rate the talent, nothing wrong with that approach. Nick Malceski was about the only free agent worth pursuing but he is hardly the cream of the crop when it comes to free agents. Picking him up now may rule out grabbing someone next year.
Winderlich vs Varcoe? Both are injury risks but the latter would cost a draft pick, I don't see what all the fuss is about.
Baloo said:That, or we paid out his last year of the contract and then put him on rookie wages. not sure how it would work to be honest, but he wont be short changed.