Agree, though it's unlikely McBean will be at Punt road next year, Griffiths performance last night deserves dropping.RICHO_12 said:Replace Griff next week
Agree, though it's unlikely McBean will be at Punt road next year, Griffiths performance last night deserves dropping.RICHO_12 said:Replace Griff next week
antman said:1 goal in five AFL games vs 4 in one VFL game - I'm starting to doubt Lamby's frequent statements that it's easier to kick goals in the AFL than the VFL.
thejinx said:Wonder if 4 goals is enough to get recalled next week?
If Vickery kicked 4 goals in the VFL, he would have been whisked straight back.
lamb22 said:Probably had more game time today than he did in his 3 AFL games this year.
antman said:Mathematical impossibility
Problem is the Beanie's had four years n only managed five games. Apart from when he had his shoulders reco'd Ty has managed to play senior footy and contribute fairly well virtually since he started his first year.thejinx said:Give McBean 5 years and 100 games and then you can compare.
TigerMasochist said:Apart from when he had his shoulders reco'd Ty has managed to play senior footy and contribute fairly well virtually since he started his first year.
TigerMasochist said:Problem is the Beanie's had four years n only managed five games. Apart from when he had his shoulders reco'd Ty has managed to play senior footy and contribute fairly well virtually since he started his first year.
The way Beanie's travelling it will take him eighty years to clock up a hundred games, wonder if he'll get on the weights n build some upper body before then? ;D.
antman said:Mathematical impossibility
The_General said:........
We'll never know what bean would have been like with sixty games development at the top level, which is the crux of the problem.
David C said:It is beginning to look like McBean is a victim of a misguided mindset of those that recruited him and coach him.
He had obvious football skills and height and was recruited on the assumption that he would "fill out" and become a strong KPP up forward, well that has obviously not happened as his body shape has not developed to fit that role.
The problem is that instead of accepting that he is a tall football with above average smarts and using the attributes that he does have in the best possible way, the fixed mindset is still trying to make him fill a role that he is not suited to and those that keep trying to force this role on him keep failing in getting he best out of him for the team.
I do wonder when a club keeps trying to bash the proverbial "square peg into the round hole" and keeps failing in that endeavour if the player would be better off going somewhere else with the common sense to use what he is capable of doing rather than what he can't do.
He is just another Richmond "tall" that we have mishandled, Richmond have not developed any of their own decent tall KPPs since the era of Richo and Benny Gale so McBean is just one of many victims in a club that has been proven to be totally clueless in developing key talls for over 20 years.
lamb22 said:.........
Hardwick is a 100% round peg coach. If he gets a square peg he tries to bash it in or shave off all the bits that make the square peg unique and /or eventually throws it away.
His tunnel vision in what he believes is right is his greatest weakness.
If he had a feel for the game and a non tin ear it might have been his greatest strength.
David C said:Is it just me or is it possible that being a not very tall "nuggety" backman type of player with average skills gets you a lot more respect and understanding at Richmond than perhaps it should?
It wouldn't be a co-incidence that our current coach used to be that sort of player and our recruiting and game plan over the last 7 years seems to be built around a team with about 15 of these players and a few token talls mixed in to make up the numbers?
Baloo said:And think I called this after the first two or three pages of this thread. When McBean gets a chance and shows nothing, somehow it won't be McBeans fault.
lamb22 said:You have an over inflated opinion of the value of your posts.
You are the equivalent of a loose hub cap. Noisy, creates the odd commotion or concern but ultimately not very serious or noteworthy.
Baloo said:And think I called this after the first two or three pages of this thread. When McBean gets a chance and shows nothing, somehow it won't be McBeans fault.
David C said:It is beginning to look like McBean is a victim of a misguided mindset of those that recruited him and coach him.
He had obvious football skills and height and was recruited on the assumption that he would "fill out" and become a strong KPP up forward, well that has obviously not happened as his body shape has not developed to fit that role.
The problem is that instead of accepting that he is a tall football with above average smarts and using the attributes that he does have in the best possible way, the fixed mindset is still trying to make him fill a role that he is not suited to and those that keep trying to force this role on him keep failing in getting he best out of him for the team.
I do wonder when a club keeps trying to bash the proverbial "square peg into the round hole" and keeps failing in that endeavour if the player would be better off going somewhere else with the common sense to use what he is capable of doing rather than what he can't do.
He is just another Richmond "tall" that we have mishandled, Richmond have not developed any of their own decent tall KPPs since the era of Richo and Benny Gale so McBean is just one of many victims in a club that has been proven to be totally clueless in developing key talls for over 20 years.