Jake Batchelor

[spook]

Had his hair cut. Coincidence? I think not.

'Course not. Man buns are for betas. Alphas don't need to peacock.

 

[Carter]

Jeez I was ready to leave the Batchelor Party.

I felt like vomiting and all the good looking sheilas had left.

Then, at around 5 o'clock in the morning, Jakey finds another keg and it's all on again.

 

[Tigerfan]

Yeah I'm enjoying the Batchelor party too!

What a coming out parade this bloke has been!

 

[Mr Brightside]

Solid again, playing the best footy his played at the club, pretty much the whole back half is atm

 

[Tenacious]

Solid again, playing the best footy his played at the club, pretty much the whole back half is atm

Once again - all credit to him - he did well.
FWIW - he's playing better than I thought he could.

 

[Batchelor Party]

3 weeks ago I was thinking of changing the user name

 

[AngryAnt]

Some of us never left the party.

 

[Baloo]

Some of us never left the party.

Too true, but we're known as the pall bearers in some circles.

 

[AngryAnt]

Too true, but we're known as the pall bearers in some circles.

Patron saints of those beyond redemption? I'm flying the flag for wee Stevie Morris at the moment.

 

[Brodders17]

im still a little unsure about his place in the line-up. he needs to play as the 3rd tall, which he does alright. but when we have opposition with tall forwards like Carlisle and Daniher (198cm+) it leaves us exposed for options. we had no choice but to have Chaplin on one of them, fortunately he was able to keep Daniher reasonably quiet.
i reckon we are rolling the dice a little and so far getting away with it, but not having a true 3rd tall might bite us against some sides, of if we have a mid-game injury to Rance or Chaplin.

 

[CarnTheTiges]

'Course not. Man buns are for betas. Alphas don't need to peacock.

I noticed that Arnott also had a new do in the VFL, maybe he and Batch got a 2 for 1 deal. He had another solid contribution. When you don't notice players like him I think it's good, because they generally tend to get noticed for the things they do wrong. Who was he on?

 

[spook]

I noticed that Arnott also had a new do in the VFL, maybe he and Batch got a 2 for 1 deal. He had another solid contribution. When you don't notice players like him I think it's good, because they generally tend to get noticed for the things they do wrong. Who was he on?

A combination of Ambrose and Cooney.

 

[CarnTheTiges]

A combination of Ambrose and Cooney.

Then he did do a decent job, because neither of them had much of an impact.

 

[The_General]

Too true, but we're known as the pall bearers in some circles.

Ok, that's three of us. Who are the others?

 

[Rancey18]

Ok, that's three of us. Who are the others?

I've always been on board with Batch. Plays within his limitations, a good solid footballer.

 

[artball]

quite like Jake. had a couple of shockers but who hasn't in their life? his opponents didn't do a lot last night. the haircut works for me. the backline are doing a great job and he is part of that.

 

[Dyer'ere]

This bloke had a very good game. Showed real maturity and poise. His aggression and skill levels look to be up. He's won me.

 

[Mr Magic]

Still mehhhh.........5 touches in a backline that played a spare most of the night. Not good enough.

 

[Mr Brightside]

I don't know the stats but definatly had Maynes measure in the air, as a critic I was very happy with his one on ones, don't think he got beat much

 

[year of the tiger]

this is a classic case with the backline where the sum of the parts is greater than each individual part (apart from Rancie) - they have individually all stepped up over the last 5 games