Tigers of Old said:Obvious question is what the hell happened in 2015 if he feels he can do better next year?
Tigers2011 said:The stark reality is the four games we lost in the past 17 were all to teams with gun rucks - either way taller or way more athletic than Maric - the rucks were Natinui; Sandilands; Jacobs & Goldstein.
Love Ivan but he isn't at the superstar level to take us to a flag & clearly Hampson isn't either. Foolish to defer addressing the ruck issue to after 2016 season.
axlefoley said:Groundhog day I guess. For the last three years we continually read and hear where they (the team) admittedly stated they could have done better or where they failed to execute a better overall game plan. There seems to be a weakness in the dynamics of the team, a flaw in our game plan, or even a lack of discipline from the coaching staff.
I am disgusted to read they did not execute a 100% effort in another cut elimination final. I hope Maric has one more season in the tank and there is no denial he is a warrior on the field, however I'm worried about him going all the way through the 2016 season. Maric needs to be carefully managed to prolong his energy and keep him fit if we go into another finals campaign in 2016. Griffiths or Vickery need to step up another notch or two to fill the void. Mcbean is another option to learn their gig too. If they can't then we may see all of Maric, Vickery, & Griffiths moved on.
I don't have a good feeling for 2016.
Leysy Days said:That was the big risk this trade period for leysy as well.
We all love Ivvy, but the fact of the matter is, him being demolished has been the oppositions driving force towards the two winnable finals in three years.
Get close to square in the ruck against both Carlton and North - we win both.
Realise getting another ruck in would upset him & the investment in Shaun.
But sometimes you have to admit you've got it wrong and upset the apple cart.
Ruck stocks = biggest worry going into 2016 (alongside Handbrake's gamestyle).
The rest of the huffing, crying and sulking about what we give up for Yarran, get for Astbury, what happens with Lennon etc. is childs play to next years chances.
Leysy Days said:That was the big risk this trade period for leysy as well.
We all love Ivvy, but the fact of the matter is, him being demolished has been the oppositions driving force towards the two winnable finals in three years.
Get close to square in the ruck against both Carlton and North - we win both.
Realise getting another ruck in would upset him & the investment in Shaun.
But sometimes you have to admit you've got it wrong and upset the apple cart.
Ruck stocks = biggest worry going into 2016 (alongside Handbrake's gamestyle).
The rest of the huffing, crying and sulking about what we give up for Yarran, get for Astbury, what happens with Lennon etc. is childs play to next years chances.
antman said:Dimma actually said this very thing in the infamous SEN interview. We've got enough mediocre rucks, if you can't get an outstanding one then don't bother.
tigersnake said:missed that. what he said. I crapped-on for nothing!
Leysy Days said:We don't need to be elite, we just need to get to a stage we can compete. There were rucks around this trade period that could have provided that.
Leysy Days said:Problem is against the cream our mediocre rucks are uncompetitive and are the single chief reason we have lost 2 of our 3 finals.
We don't need to be elite, we just need to get to a stage we can compete. There were rucks around this trade period that could have provided that.
We can't cry bad luck if badly losing the rucks costs us another final ILHO cos Maric and Hampson are still going to get towelled.
The one way of thinking leysy could entertain - they believe Griff or TV can and will be be moved into the number 1 ruck role as the year progresses.
That could give us some chance of holding our own.
ninjahaha said:Who do you believe was available and an upgrade?
antman said:All good Snakey. I'm paraphrasing too by the way, he didn't actually say our rucks are mediocre :hihi
Coburgtiger said:The stats man was talking more about height wasn't he?
I think he said, we've got enough 200 cm rucks, if we're going after one, it'll be a monster.
Yes. But then we recruited Mabior Chol under 200cm so I'm confused.Coburgtiger said:The stats man was talking more about height wasn't he?
I think he said, we've got enough 200 cm rucks, if we're going after one, it'll be a monster.
tigertim said:Yes. But then we recruited Mabior Chol under 200cm so I'm confused.