theglove3 said:So I assume he has accepted sanction.
When does he have to let them know by?
Can he challenge and it still stays a week if challenge fails?
mrposhman said:I believe so. I wouldn't be surprised to see both us and Collingwood at the tribunal. As much as a dislike him, there is no way that Cox should miss a game for that, not even a fine for me. Grimes's was clumsy but we could challenge on it being below reportable contact. Not sure we would win on that argument though, but it does seem crazy that such a soft hit misses a week, but a gut punch that takes players down for a good minute only gets a fine. Christian reckons its because they didn't come off, that's a cop out for mine.
theglove3 said:So I assume he has accepted sanction.
When does he have to let them know by?
Can he challenge and it still stays a week if challenge fails?
se7en said:Yes accepted the 1 week
Cox challenged and lost. Still out just the 1 week
tigers1980 said:If Grimes was concussed from Cox incident, is it arguable that based on Grimes being concussed that the contact on Elliott was not intentional?
DirtyDogTiger said:Grimes could have argued he wasn’t thinking properly after cox hit him.
Bullarto Tiger said:We're going to really miss Grimes on the weekend. His loss will be an almost impossible hole to fill.
zippadeee said:Dont worry Hardwick will go the ‘depth’ and bring in Menadue.
God help us.
Bullarto Tiger said:We're going to really miss Grimes on the weekend. His loss will be an almost impossible hole to fill.
BrisTiger24 said:Is Toby Green playing? If not, it probably cancels out as I expect that is who Grimes would have played on.
Garthwaite on Cameron, Astbury on Keefe or resting ruck, Balta on Himmelberg and Broad on Haynes (if he plays forward, looked good v Weagles there)
spook said:Grimes ran at a bloke with his arm raised and hit him in the head with it. He was lucky to only get 1 week.