leon said:So what determines the outcome and weeks penalty is the "media hype"; not the AFL's own constituted panels, policies and processes? I fully agree with you, and also that the first decision on Houli was right. Three down to two because of his impeccable record, and it was in play, with Lamb illegally holding him, which was ignored by the umpires!
But here exactly is the downfall of your case, and the reasons for so many objecting and complaining.
So Membrey got half as much as Houli did in the end, and in effect probably the same penalty as Grimes who was taken out of this match leaving the team a man down plus will most likely miss this week, because it's all run by the media? Who, in their non-reaction to Membrey's brutal smash of Dylan's head, behaved altogether differently over Houli?
I think it leaves some interesting conclusions to be logically drawn.
Well I don't think it's the downfall of my case. I agree with you Houli should have received 2. the same as Membrey received. I can't fathom why Houli gets 4 and Membrey gets 2 other than the media pressure. The mitigating factor for Membrey was that his was in play going for a mark with a player courageously and maybe originally unexpectedly backing into the pack whereas Houli's was off the ball. But I believe both incidents were careless, not intentional. Bugg's on the other hand, that is the sort of incident that goes straight to the tribunal.