Just hate the way Richmond gets pushed around these days. By other clubs and by the governing body. It wasn't always this way.
Tigerdangerous said:How can the club fire up and take on the AFL and show real muscle comradery on the field in letting the opposition know you hit one of ours and you will be hit back; when the club is ruled over by Ms. Peggy and our CEO who is more concerned about the cut of his suits rather than the cuts over our players faces!!!!
....
Boom!tigertim said:Pfft, head high contact crackdown was sooo last week.
MRP will give him 2 weeks. Probably down to 1 if he pleads guilty.
Tigers of Old said:What a frekken disgrace. 2 weeks for nearly breaking a players face.
Membrey had plenty of time to choose another option.
Show that one to the mums making a decision as to what sport junior will play.
I’m talking about a culture of rolling over and letting the AFL and other clubs walk all over you.KnightersRevenge said:I was just thinking how noticeable it was that when we were winning no one was taking aim at the Prez. Then BANG! somehow someone finds a way to blame her for a dog act and the insipid response by the players at the time? SMH. :don't know
Yeah the two finger salute seems to draw more attention than other crowd interactions. Wasn't Nathan Brown fined for something similar when he was at the Dogs?LeeToRainesToRoach said:Interesting that Martin gets a fine for a playful two-finger salute to the Collingwood cheer squad, but no action on Oliver saying "I'll *smile*ing kill you" to a spectator. More unequal treatment.
Hope this affair scandal at head office blows up in their faces.
Tigers of Old said:What a frekken disgrace. 2 weeks for nearly breaking a players face.
Membrey had plenty of time to choose another option.
Show that one to the mums making a decision as to what sport junior will play.
:clap :clap :claptigerlove said:2 weeks was fine. Everyone is up in arms these days for every incident and wants players suspended for weeks on end. Incidents like Bugg, 100%, throw the book at them, but these in play incidents you have to have some level of discretion. Grimes was backing into a pack, Membrey was jumping forward, yeah his arm went out and collected Grimesy, which is why it deserves two, but most guys are going to try and protect themselves a little when in the air and unbalanced like that. I hate the way everything is dissected these days in ultra slow motion. It always makes things intentional wise look worse than it was.
I also hate this mum argument. Footy is a tough sport. You get injured. Incidental contact happens. If it concerns you as a mother then don't let your son play footy. Pretty simple. I know many parents of kids playing footy and everyone is comfortable at junior level with the rules in place.
tigerlove said:2 weeks was fine. Everyone is up in arms these days for every incident and wants players suspended for weeks on end. Incidents like Bugg, 100%, throw the book at them, but these in play incidents you have to have some level of discretion. Grimes was backing into a pack, Membrey was jumping forward, yeah his arm went out and collected Grimesy, which is why it deserves two, but most guys are going to try and protect themselves a little when in the air and unbalanced like that. I hate the way everything is dissected these days in ultra slow motion. It always makes things intentional wise look worse than it was.
I also hate this mum argument. Footy is a tough sport. You get injured. Incidental contact happens. If it concerns you as a mother then don't let your son play footy. Pretty simple. I know many parents of kids playing footy and everyone is comfortable at junior level with the rules in place.
tigerlove said:2 weeks was fine. Everyone is up in arms these days for every incident and wants players suspended for weeks on end. Incidents like Bugg, 100%, throw the book at them, but these in play incidents you have to have some level of discretion. Grimes was backing into a pack, Membrey was jumping forward, yeah his arm went out and collected Grimesy, which is why it deserves two, but most guys are going to try and protect themselves a little when in the air and unbalanced like that. I hate the way everything is dissected these days in ultra slow motion. It always makes things intentional wise look worse than it was.
I also hate this mum argument. Footy is a tough sport. You get injured. Incidental contact happens. If it concerns you as a mother then don't let your son play footy. Pretty simple. I know many parents of kids playing footy and everyone is comfortable at junior level with the rules in place.
Tigers of Old said:This would have been a good post in 1978.
tigerlove said:No it's a valid post now. Do you have kids playing AFL footy? Do you speak to other parents. You make stuff up as if it is gospel. MRP gave the guy two weeks. Absolutely correct decision. Move on.
Tigerflag2008 said:I think it makes Bartel look like an even bigger dill by coming out on radio and claiming Houli got off litely, then the next week goes lite on membrey.
There is no place for the tribunal panel in the media, full stop. You don't see judges do it.
Another afl farce and amateur hour.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:I'll remind you of this next time Richmond gets rogered by the MRP.
tigertim said:I get your feelings on OTT reactions but how is an elbow to the face worthy of 2 weeks?