Tigers of Old said:In the battle of the Brownlow, Danger(suspension aside) came out well on top yesterday.
Luckily for Dusty Danger got rubbed out cos he wouldve grabbed 3 yesterday and could well have stitched up the Brownlow.
Tigers of Old said:In the battle of the Brownlow, Danger(suspension aside) came out well on top yesterday.
craig said:Luckily for Dusty Danger got rubbed out cos he wouldve grabbed 3 yesterday and could well have stitched up the Brownlow.
jb03 said:Dangerfield may not even poll. Taylor, Motlop and Guthrie at least in front.
Fair enought and tend to agree but i was trying to make the point that he may not poll. i.e. the umpires won't see it the same way.Tigers of Old said:Geez jimbob really?
30 possessions & 10 tackles. Thought he was the best player on the park by a distance. Huge.
i thought the same.SCOOP said:I think Adams was meaning "would you go knowing he is going to win by so much?"
More by how much as it being personal. Could be wrong tho.
saigon tiger said:So hypothetical Martin holds off on talks until after the finals and season finishes and his form in the finals is poor or average what happens? Do we still have out 1.2 million offer on the table? Will North or whoever pay big dollars for a bloke who has never done anything special in a finals campaign? Intersting times ahead. If he wants the big dollars he needs to be a September champion!
thegdog said:we owe him nothing.
saigon tiger said:Im not a big Dangerfield liker think he is a bit up himself but when he left the crows asked for fair compensation for them and said he wanted to play with the cats on a high but fair salary so they still had the opportunity to bring in extra talent. Compare this to Martin and his management who just want the big bucks and dont seem to want play the team first philosophy!
saigon tiger said:Im not a big Dangerfield liker think he is a bit up himself but when he left the crows asked for fair compensation for them and said he wanted to play with the cats on a high but fair salary so they still had the opportunity to bring in extra talent. Compare this to Martin and his management who just want the big bucks and dont seem to want play the team first philosophy!
It's an afl.com.au article that was also posted on the RFC site because the AFL controls our website.easy said:Whats with RFC.com writing an article about Dusty on track for most brownlow votes ever?
The footy blokes would hate the geeks creating cyclones of wind up players arses.
spook said:It's an afl.com.au article that was also posted on the RFC site because the AFL controls our website.
craig said:Luckily for Dusty Danger got rubbed out cos he wouldve grabbed 3 yesterday and could well have stitched up the Brownlow.
Baloo said:Odds are he won't poll. Good chance he won't poll for the rest of the year no matter how good he plays.