Coronavirus | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Coronavirus

There has been a fair bit of talk about how effective the vaccine is and how some countries with high vaccination rates are still getting infections. While the infection numbers in countries with high vaccination rates can be high, and while this makes a good headline for the likes of Murdoch tabloids, the reality is more nuanced as a good article in The Age showed today.

Among other things it stated:



Also:



Note what it says: the vaccine's purpose is not to prevent the spread of the virus, it's purpose is to cut serious disease and death, and to make the number of infections far less relevant because the virus is causing a far lower rate of sickness, serious sickness and death.

The full article is here: https://www.theage.com.au/world/eur...country-getting-it-right-20210628-p5852n.html

So, can we get the bloody vaccination done now?

DS
D,id the poms give AZ to everyone or just old people?
 
I doubt India have access to enough vaccines for their 1.4 billion population. Maybe they're the world real test of herd immunity? Dunno whats going on there now.

On another note, there was a standing ovation for the scientists credited with developing Astra Zeneca - interesting that the announcer called it the "anti Covid vaccine". The UK were in a terrible position 6 months ago with covid literally everwhere, and they had no choice but to take what was on offer at the time. Now they're approaching 50% total vaccination and appear to be very appreciative of their scientists.


And TBH, I'm still very unsure what to do about vaccines myself, I'm under 40 but i don't trust Scott Morrison as far as i can throw him. I do trust Brett Sutton though, so if he comes out and states that under 40's should get the Astra Zeneca then I'll make an appointment. Hence why i was asking @MB78 to show me the quote he referenced yesterday.
Why would you take Suttons view over The QldnChO ? Both seem to be equally qualified.
 
The panel that told the govt to stop AZ to under 60s.
That’s not what Atagi who advise the National Cabinet said. To quote the Guardian:

“The states are correct to say the current Atagi advice is that Pfizer (not AstraZeneca) is the preferred vaccine for Australians aged between 16 and 60.
But the advice also creates room for informed consent. It states that AstraZeneca can be used in adults under 60 (when Pfizer is not available) when the benefits “are likely to outweigh the risks for that individual” and the person has “made an informed decision based on an understanding of the risks and benefits”.
 
You’d think so wouldn’t you ?

If you’re the antithesis of an anti vaxxer dhead and instead you took a max vax approach, would a 2:1 benefit you if you could get it ?

Interesting.

The short answer is it probably wouldn't hurt.

The long answer is that immunology is *smile* complicated. It's a complex network of processes, and saying it's probably fine is a bit like saying longer kick ins, 6-6-6 and standing the mark will probably increase scoring.

Which is why in the field of medical science, things go through trials before they're approved for use, but in football, a moron abuses his pen license.

But it's likely that future boosters for covid will be the mRNA (Pfizer type) vaccines, not the AZ type. And there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to get that post AZ.

I don't think it's a good idea to try to 'Catch' em all' though. Any intervention is risk/reward and once you're fully vaccinated, that balance changes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The advice doesn’t come with the boundary conditions the advice is based on. Im sure if we said we are opening borders and banning lockdowns the advice would be for everyone to get whatever they could (Prioritised). I can’t help but think the advice is based on status quo living with COVID responses For Australia.

I think this article does a reasonable job laying out the issues that need to be addressed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The short answer is it probably wouldn't hurt.

The long answer is that immunology is *smile* complicated. It's a complex network of processes, and saying it's probably fine is a bit like saying longer kick ins, 6-6-6 and standing the mark will probably increase scoring.

Which is why in the field of medical science, things go through trials before they're approved for use, but in football, a moron abuses his pen license.

But it's likely that future boosters for covid will be the mRNA (Pfizer type) vaccines, not the AZ type. And there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to get that post AZ.

I don't think it's a good idea to try to 'Catch' em all' though. Any intervention is risk/reward and once you're fully vaccinated, that balance changes.
Right. So you’re saying I should be able to take a super cocktail of AZ, Pfizer, Novovax and J&J when it’s approved, and not only be able to transmit to Mars but also be able to receive every single sports channel in the world - subscription pay tv based or not.

This is the answer I was looking for.
 
The advice doesn’t come with the boundary conditions the advice is based on. Im sure if we said we are opening borders and banning lockdowns the advice would be for everyone to get whatever they could (Prioritised). I can’t help but think the advice is based on status quo living with COVID responses For Australia.

I think this article does a reasonable job laying out the issues that need to be addressed.
The Pfizer advice from the AMA is based on the following: 3.1 clotting events per 100K for under 50's, 2.7/100K for 50-60, 1.5/100K for 60-80. Hence ATAGI decreed Pfizer preferred for u60's as that is where they deem the "acceptable" cutoff is, given the decreased frequency of blood clots with AZ after 60. But it's a sliding scale and you could still suffer clotting if you're over 60.

Some more data on AZ from the UK.
Up to 16 June 2021, the MHRA had received Yellow Card reports of 389 cases of major thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) in the UK following vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca. Thirty one of the 389 reports have been reported after a second dose. Of the 389 reports, 203 occurred in women, and 183 occurred in men aged from 18 to 93 years. The overall case fatality rate was 17% with 68 deaths, four of which occurred after the second dose.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...irus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting

The prevailing view here is that if you don't rush out and get jabbed with whatever's available, you're selfish and all the rest. But it's a personal decision, and as has been mentioned there are other factors to take into account (e.g. greater efficacy of Pfizer). If your worry about catching the virus before Pfizer becomes available outweighs your concern about the clotting issues, by all means go out and get the AZ, although if you're under 60 you should probably seek advice from your GP even if it's not legally binding.

Bye.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Based on failures by State's actions in their management of HQ they setup.
Very true. We know that Slowmo has to get the vaccine’s moving. But the simple mistakes being made that would be fixed with common sense is outrageous. The young receptionist in Queensland should have not been able to work at the hospital in that role unless vaccinated. Putting overseas and interstate people together in hotel quarantine who would have thought that’s a bad idea.

There needs to be more National Cabinets until they can all get there act together. And there needs to be press releases that are agreed upon so that the hopeless communication is improved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users