I'd like to tattoo "uoy tceffa ton seod od I tahW" on your forehead. If you see it in the mirror every morning, it might sink in.if it doesn't affect me personally I won't do it . . .
Excuse me while I eat my entitled Nando's.
I'd like to tattoo "uoy tceffa ton seod od I tahW" on your forehead. If you see it in the mirror every morning, it might sink in.if it doesn't affect me personally I won't do it . . .
Lee I understand your point to an extent about the economy not opening up to the rest of the world until next year BUT even Sutton was asked earlier in the week where if there are future outbreaks when wouldn't they lockdown, ie. what % of victorians do we need to be vaccinated in order to make lockdowns unlikely, and I think there was a comment around %. Whilst it may be 80% for opening the International border, having a lower target to ensure that we don't fall in and out of lockdowns is huge for the economy over the next 12 months.
I'll be getting vaccinated as soon as I'm added to the list. I'm 39 so just outside of the current approved list.
There's been no instruction that future lockdowns can be avoided by getting vaccinated. None. I dare say they don't know enough to provide that sort of guidance.Lee I understand your point to an extent about the economy not opening up to the rest of the world until next year BUT even Sutton was asked earlier in the week where if there are future outbreaks when wouldn't they lockdown, ie. what % of victorians do we need to be vaccinated in order to make lockdowns unlikely, and I think there was a comment around %. Whilst it may be 80% for opening the International border, having a lower target to ensure that we don't fall in and out of lockdowns is huge for the economy over the next 12 months.
I'll be getting vaccinated as soon as I'm added to the list. I'm 39 so just outside of the current approved list.
I have some questions I hope someone can answer. First off, I’m not an anti vaxxer, just had my flu shot and need to wait a bit for the corona jab.
My understanding is the vaccine doesn’t stop you getting the virus, or stop you from spreading it. It just hopefully minimises the effects of the virus in you. Is this correct?
Assuming that the above statement is correct, if vaccinated people have caught the virus and have symptoms bad enough to feel like getting tested, results would turn up as positive correct?
Can a positive result be differentiated between someone who is vaccinated as opposed to someone that hasn’t been?
I keep seeing on the news reports that traces of the virus have been detected in waste water. Affected vaccinated people would still expel infected waste wouldn’t they?
I guess what I’m asking is, if even though enough people get vaccinated, can the virus still spread enough for governments to order lockdowns?
There's been no instruction that future lockdowns can be avoided by getting vaccinated. None. I dare say they don't know enough to provide that sort of guidance.
There's been no instruction that future lockdowns can be avoided by getting vaccinated.Except of course the actual science.
My understanding is that yes, you can contract it and can spread it, but the time windows are drastically reduced so there a far shorter period where you can pass it on.I guess what I’m asking is, if even though enough people get vaccinated, can the virus still spread enough for governments to order lockdowns?
There's been no instruction that future lockdowns can be avoided by getting vaccinated.
I will repeat this for as long as necessary for it to sink in.
Either the federal or state government. If they announce there will be no lockdowns after date X, again, I will get the first jab three months ahead. But they haven't and won't in the near future.Instruction from who? Your lord and master Scott in Canberra?
There's been no instruction that future lockdowns can be avoided by getting vaccinated.
I will repeat this for as long as necessary for it to sink in.
Point me to the official government statement, please. I'm sure I'd have heard about it if there'd been one.Sorry Lee but this is just not correct.
Having everyone vaccinated is the reason we should be able to a avoid lockdowns in the future and having people move about freely whilst the virus is present in our society .
I have some questions I hope someone can answer. First off, I’m not an anti vaxxer, just had my flu shot and need to wait a bit for the corona jab.
My understanding is the vaccine doesn’t stop you getting the virus, or stop you from spreading it. It just hopefully minimises the effects of the virus in you. Is this correct?
Assuming that the above statement is correct, if vaccinated people have caught the virus and have symptoms bad enough to feel like getting tested, results would turn up as positive correct?
Can a positive result be differentiated between someone who is vaccinated as opposed to someone that hasn’t been?
I keep seeing on the news reports that traces of the virus have been detected in waste water. Affected vaccinated people would still expel infected waste wouldn’t they?
I guess what I’m asking is, if even though enough people get vaccinated, can the virus still spread enough for governments to order lockdowns?
Good get. Yes, he's a bit of a different beast from the deluded hillbilly deniers, like a lot of the coalition like Freidenberg they know CC is real but don't care, its just about now, votes, the next election. So in a way he's worse than Joyce and Christensen, because at least they make a show of addressing the ethical barriers. JF also said if you were doing it hard if you were on $250K pa. He knew it was *smile* of course, just a cynical vote grab.The Member for Coal, in the Hunter. Coal Shitgibbon I think his name is.
Thanks for that antHere's some more data and research on this Legends.
In the UK, one dose of AZ or Pfizer - not both doses, just one, halves likelihood of transmission. Given the r0 is (growth of infection rate) is around 1.4-2.5 in most countries and lower in Australia, if we get the number below 1 then the virus dies. A rate below 1 means that one infectious person infects less than 1 other person. Below 1, a disease dies out.
Covid: One dose of vaccine halves transmission - study
People who get coronavirus after their first jab are up to 49% less likely to pass it on, research suggests.www.bbc.com
Dr Mary Ramsay, head of immunisation at PHE, said: "Vaccines are vital in helping us return to a normal way of life. Not only do vaccines reduce the severity of illness and prevent hundreds of deaths every day, we now see they also have an additional impact on reducing the chance of passing Covid-19 on to others."
Again from the UK - with 55 million people vaccinated the UK anticipates lifting most forms of lockdown by June. They do anticipate keeping a range of social restrictions until the end of this year, and of course they won't guarantee no lockdowns. There could be other flare ups, new variants etc so Lee wanting an absolute ironclad guarantee of "no lockdowns" ever again is of course completely fanciful.
Wellbeing - Heathy Living, Family Health | GoodtoKnow
Living well and feeling good. We’re here with expert advice to improve your physical and mental health - from pregnancy to postpartum, as well as self-care tips for mums. Plus, expert overviews of common childhood conditions.www.goodto.com
Here's the statement from Boris on how vaccination is allowing the country to open up.
“I know there will be many people who will be worried that we are being too ambitious and that it is arrogant to impose any kind of plan upon a virus.” The Prime Minister said, “And I agree that we must always be humble in the face of nature and we must be cautious but I really also believe that the vaccination programme has dramatically changed the odds in our favour and it is on that basis that we can now proceed.
Mass vaccination should be our number one priority.
Thanks balooMy understanding is that yes, you can contract it and can spread it, but the time windows are drastically reduced so there a far shorter period where you can pass it on.
That's why it's important for everyone to be vaccinated as soon as possible. It will reduce the spread significantly.
Good get. Yes, he's a bit of a different beast from the deluded hillbilly deniers, like a lot of the coalition like Freidenberg they know CC is real but don't care, its just about now, votes, the next election. So in a way he's worse than Joyce and Christensen, because at least they make a show of addressing the ethical barriers.
Funny coincidence, just as I read this Freidenberg was on the news speaking at the Liberal Party convention, was joking they'd sent Fitzgibbon some membership forms.