Phantom said:
Read my original post.
My guess!
It was a sabotage that was meant to look like an industrial accident that would reflect badly on the Grollos.
When events took an unexpected turn for the worst, any evidence of sabotage was tampered with and gotten rid of.
Anyone not knowing about John Setka should read this.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/rap-sheet-reveals-60-charges-for-would-be-union-boss-john-setka/story-fn59niix-1226460322445
The man has a history of being a violent criminal and now is in charge of the CFMEU.
Sorry I thought you were taking the p!ss. So reading through you’re original post -
….the Gillard government actively giving the Unions "carte blanche" to do anything necessary to gain power industrially.
Okay, Which unions? Name them.
How has the carte blanche policy manifested itself?
What industrial actions have been taken?
Union sabotage of the wall based on what evidence? .........Your guess?... is that it?
A joint venture with which organized crime groups? What evidence?
Why do the unions want to send the Grollos broke? Who do the unions want the Grollos replaced with? How will Grollos replacement contractors benefit the building unions?
If it wasn’t windy that day what else was making the trees along the eastern freeway bend to and fro when I was driving into city?
If it wasn’t windy what triggered the wall to fall down?
Why would the manufacturing unions want to destroy their own manufacturing industry? No work, no workers, no unions – how does that make union officials more powerful?
John Setka is the building union leader. He's no angel. So what? You ever worked in the building industry? It's a tough industry -shovelling sh!te and pushing a barrow doesn't attract monks or PhDs for labourers, tradies or leaders.
Back to your original post - how about supporting your anti union rant with some facts?