rosy23 said:I found it interesting that DH is quoted as saying Dan will be a part of our short term future at the moment.
Azza said:Not exactly a ringing endorsement.
rosy23 said:I found it interesting that DH is quoted as saying Dan will be a part of our short term future at the moment.
ICE said:12 disposals yesterday
33% effectiveness (ie 4 disposals, including the 3 goals)
5 clangers
Although he is very one sided, he could play a similar role to Stevie J up forward. He has good ball winning ability, can mark overhead, some tricks, difficult match up. The point of difference that makes Stevie J great is what he does with the ball - makes the right decisions and hits targets - this is the area of Dan's game that needs a lot of work.
If you removed the clangers from yesterday's game he would have had an outstanding game.
It will be interesting to see if he gets any coaches votes.
Sintiger said:Yesterday is an example of why teams need a Dan Connors type player around. You can't have too many of them but having one player in the team who has the ability to do things that win you a game is invaluable. X factor players who infuriate at times and delight at other times.
He is the type of player who will take a hanger with 2 minutes to go in a tight game but he is also the type to give away a vital free by trying to take a hanger and not succeeding.
Personally I like him in the team.
Sintiger said:Yesterday is an example of why teams need a Dan Connors type player around. You can't have too many of them but having one player in the team who has the ability to do things that win you a game is invaluable. X factor players who infuriate at times and delight at other times.
He is the type of player who will take a hanger with 2 minutes to go in a tight game but he is also the type to give away a vital free by trying to take a hanger and not succeeding.
Personally I like him in the team.
Leysy Days said:One thing recent games have told leysy is that we need to target a quality small forward or two in the coming draft/trade period. Nahas & King are fulfilling the role OK now but have queries if they are up to having an impact in big games in September when the standard increases. The fact they pose no threat overhead limits them when things get tough/tight & space is at a premium ILO.
jamo said:Listening to the interview with White and Connors on RFC website, I sensed sarcasm in Dan's voice when he said I was happy to be out there with all my GOOD MATES. I wonder if Dan feels he has been hard done bye of late. Didn't he ask to be traded last year ?
Disco08 said:It's a very good point Leysy. Milne takes advantage of teams focusing on Reiwoldt and Kositzchke and often gets open on the fat side for easy marks. He also converts pretty well and can kick a set shot from 50. King takes virtually no marks inside 50 despite opponents often paying him little attention and while Nahas is slightly better at finding space inside 50 his inability to convert from anywhere outside 35m totally negates many of those efforts.
Not sure who the answer is though ATM.