True also.Both goals from frees rather than skill and nous.
True also.Both goals from frees rather than skill and nous.
Is this what you think or what you thing Dimma thinks. For what its worth I think the match C are likely to drop Cumberland if Martin is fit and drop Jack when hell freezes over.Despite some of the rhetoric, our older players won't be dropped for this one.
In Hopper, Short, Martin and Sonsie (though I'd consider leaving Martin another week, we need him to be at full fitness)
Out Ross (will make us too slow if we bring Hopper back in), Hugo, Ryan, Clarke (I liked Clarkes game, particularly in the first half)
Cumberland and Mansell to swap the forward / sub positions
If 1 of the returning 3 don't play, then we keep Clarke in the side.
Is this what you think or what you thing Dimma thinks. For what its worth I think the match C are likely to drop Cumberland if Martin is fit and drop Jack when hell freezes over.
I don't believe I have said either should retire. But I don't believe either are still in our best 23. If the team is to grow and keep up, their places should be used to provide opportunities to emerging players, especially early in the season. This is particularly the case when we have emerging players who have come to us after reaching 20-22 or so.I just don't get your beliefs around footy. We are still i the flag hunt, yet you have wanted Tarrant retired and want Jack retired. They are both a lot better than our next group in those positions. You essentially want to dump Jack for Miller in the forward line, lets reverse the question. What makes you think Miller can do the same or better than Jack in the forward line??? Reference Jakcs 2nd goal yesterday from the boundary line and compare that to Miller against Carlton. I like Miller back and in the ruck but I'm yet to be convinced he can score enough goals when forward.
I am not happy with 'distain'. That is just more of your stick up the arse.With Cumberland I'm not sure. I want him in the team but it depends where they play Dusty. I think it depends on 2nd ruck. I don't think we are gaining much from that and I think we need the extra runner against the Dogs anyway, so I'd go in with 1 less tall, particularly forward. Lynch or Jack can take the ruck contests in the forward 50. If needed, at centre bounces we can use Pickett for his leap.
Your disdain of Jack is astounding for a Tigers supporter IMO. Jack has done enough in his 3 games this year to warrant his spot in the team.
Jack hasn’t been terrible but team balance wise I’d rather Cumberland in than him at this point. We need Samson to back up ruck, Cumberland offers a lot more at ground level than Jack and he and Dusty can also mark really well for their size. Just because he’s a 300+ game champ of our club, doesn’t mean he’s a lock every weekWith Cumberland I'm not sure. I want him in the team but it depends where they play Dusty. I think it depends on 2nd ruck. I don't think we are gaining much from that and I think we need the extra runner against the Dogs anyway, so I'd go in with 1 less tall, particularly forward. Lynch or Jack can take the ruck contests in the forward 50. If needed, at centre bounces we can use Pickett for his leap.
Your disdain of Jack is astounding for a Tigers supporter IMO. Jack has done enough in his 3 games this year to warrant his spot in the team.
I am not happy with 'distain'. That is just more of your stick up the arse.
Jack hasn’t been terrible but team balance wise I’d rather Cumberland in than him at this point. We need Samson to back up ruck, Cumberland offers a lot more at ground level than Jack and he and Dusty can also mark really well for their size. Just because he’s a 300+ game champ of our club, doesn’t mean he’s a lock every week
That’s what Samson is for? He doesn’t have to ruck much and it won’t hurt if he’s not in the forward line for a period of time. I get where you’re coming from but I feel like we need to be more dynamic and that’s exactly what cumberland was last night. Maybe Samson goes out but then who back up rucks? Can’t be Pickett every weekDusty's good one on one, but he's not a good mark over his head. He marks well because of his strength, he needs to be 1 out to do that. Taking the 2nd best defender and playing permanently forward to ensure they don't double team Lynch is not Dusty's go (nor is it Cumberlands).
That’s what Samson is for? He doesn’t have to ruck much and it won’t hurt if he’s not in the forward line for a period of time. I get where you’re coming from but I feel like we need to be more dynamic and that’s exactly what cumberland was last night. Maybe Samson goes out but then who back up rucks? Can’t be Pickett every week
Yep I think you may be right and I think Cotch won’t make the trip so Sonsie might get his opportunity then. Would love him in against the dogs though, he’s such a smooth moverI think it will be a bit of horses for courses over the coming weeks personally.
I don't see us dropping Jack when we are 1-1-1 and its probably our most winable game out of our next batch of 3. FWIW I suspect he doesn't travel to Adelaide in Round 5 so we may see what a forward line without Jack looks like then. Plus I think Samson can probably the Swans defence more than the Dogs. The Swans would play Rampe on Jack, not sure they can do that with Samson.
O come on here! Whipping boy? Just because Short did not play?????????Interesting how many are calling for Ross' head.
Seems we've found the pre whipping boy for 2023.
23 disposals, 3 clearances and a goal. Disposal efficiency at 80 percent.
Statistically, was in our top 5 or 6 players. Not a bad first up game when everyone else was so down.
It's also interesting to me how often he's the guy running to be an option as a runner out of a contest. The link man.
Combine that with getting up for a goal, and that was the most Lamberty game I've seen from a tiger since Lambert.
He's a type we need.
Simply he has lost the ability to reach the contest. He can’t keep up.Rubbish, you continually bag Jack out. He didn't have a great game last night but was pretty good in the 1st 2 rounds. Also, you say he's not best 23, so please tell me who is this awesome forward thats pushed Jack out of the team??
Miller has no confidence in kicking for goal, he's good in defence and the ruck but has no confidence when inside F50. Samsons played 3 games, he has something, but neother of them have pushed Jack out of our best 23.
You call me out thinking I have a stick up my arse over Jack, well please tell me who has pushed him out of team as the 2nd tall forward, I'm all ears.
That's never been Jack's way, but I've seen it become the way for plenty of stars who are right at the end. It's just one game but I hope that's not a sign of things to come.Don't you need skill and nous to get the frees?
Simply he has lost the ability to reach the contest. He can’t keep up.
Who has pushed him out?
It is no contest until someone else gets a go. I’d like to see Bauer get a go . I’d like to see Ryan get sustained go but three tall forwards are one too many.
I’d like to see Miller tried at CHF but no one will get a serious shot at any of the above, while Jack is an automatic in.
Tylar Young is getting that opportunity now as a defender.
That has occurred only because Tarrant was unfit.