-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
capital punishment..ivan milat..j.knight.p.dupas..and any other scum
- Thread starter ssstone
- Start date
Disco08 said:
Naive, gullible, and SOFT.
And simply looking for excuses for not using the death penalty on people who clearly deserve to be eradicated from this planet.
Keeping people in jails leads to this:
http://www.acea.org.au/Content/1998/FOX.pdf
....which contradicts the premise that jails shouldn't be along the lines of punishment/deterrent, but more along the lines of rehabilitiation.
If people like Knight, Sharpe, Bryant, etc were 'removed', then surely that would help with the rehabilitiation of criminals that have not committed obscene crimes as the above report suggests?
Removing cretins like Anita Cobby rapists, Leslie Camilleri, Dupas, Milat, Sharpe, Bryant, Knight, Dante Arthurs, Farquarson, Snowtown killers, Derek Percy, Kathleen Folbigg, etc, etc...by not overcrowding the jails and also saving the taxpayers money should be a greater benefit that 'wondering' why these scumbags did what they did.
There will always be evil people out there, I'm afraid.
Liverpool said:
Tell me Liverpool, what percentage of Australian prisoners do you think deserve the death penalty? Enough to have an affect on overcrowding? :rofl
Liverpool said:
Of course. Because saving the taxpayers a couple of bucks a year is far more important than preventing a murder.
Liverpool said:
If we leave it up to people who have little knowledge but loud opinions, there'll be more than there has to be.
lindsay beckett and lesley camillieri repeatedly raped 2 innocent little girls and then stabbed one in the neck to kill her and cut the other girls throat until she died.
these 2 little girls families and friends and all taxpayers have to pay for these 2 things to be fed,clothed,showered,get free medical and dental care,pay for study and course fees,tv`s,doonas,tim tams,cans of coke,ice creams and movies for the rest of their lives.
well at least in camillieri`s case it`s for the rest of his life,but beckett is eligible for parole in 2033,aged 59.
they also get to breath fresh air,feel the sun on their face,kick the footy,play cricket, lift weights and go for walks.
how can anyone seriously regard this as justice and a fitting punishment?
these 2 little girls families and friends and all taxpayers have to pay for these 2 things to be fed,clothed,showered,get free medical and dental care,pay for study and course fees,tv`s,doonas,tim tams,cans of coke,ice creams and movies for the rest of their lives.
well at least in camillieri`s case it`s for the rest of his life,but beckett is eligible for parole in 2033,aged 59.
they also get to breath fresh air,feel the sun on their face,kick the footy,play cricket, lift weights and go for walks.
how can anyone seriously regard this as justice and a fitting punishment?
Disco08 said:
Suitable punishment for killing two little girls?
Suitable punishment for the families of the girls who have had their daughters taken from them forever....with no chance of parole, or visits, etc?
Please!
Disco08 said:
Even if only one cretin is removed...that is one less in prison and one less that the taxpayer has to worry about....and one less that the families have to worry about, as they will have closure knowing that the cretin can never be released on parole if he is dead.
The names I mentioned in my last post are only a handul off the top of my head, so there would be wel over 50+ that could be removed.
Disco08 said:
well, you get two bird for the price of one.....being eradicated means they cannot commit another murder, therefore this risk is prevented....as well as saving taxpayers a few bucks as well. Win/win situation for all parties (except the cretin executed, of course!
)Disco08 said:
I don't think I need to be a world-renowned expert to give the opinion that there are evil people out there....and that there will always be evil people out there praying on others. I wouldn't have thought that was such a startling opinion...
Liverpool said:
I'd rather be dead than spend the rest of my life in a maximum security jail cell.
Liverpool said:
50 out of 25000+. That'll ease the overcrowding. LOL.
Liverpool said:well, you get two bird for the price of one.....being eradicated means they cannot commit another murder, therefore this risk is prevented....as well as saving taxpayers a few bucks as well. Win/win situation for all parties (except the cretin executed, of course!
And you lose any opportunity of using them for research which could (and certainly has in the past) lead to future murders being prevented. So you've cost innocent people their lives by not taking advantage of the resources available.
Disco08 said:
That's your choice.
They shouldn't get a choice.
Disco08 said:
I said well over 50+.
I would think that would be a good start.
Disco08 said:
O.k...what research has been conducted on Julian Knight, that has prevented future murders?
Nothing.
But he has a degree....so that's a positive.... :
the claw said:
I'm with you all the way Clawman! :clap
