Question for advocates of pushing Houli because of the “staggered retirements” theory.
Why should this well-balanced Richmond list stagger retirements when we have a nice, balanced spread of ages?
The retirements will happen naturally at different times anyway, and they won’t cause us to fall off a cliff because our list isn’t heavily skewed.
E.g. Edwards is 33, Astbury is 30, but Astbury wants to retire while Shane goes in for surgery to keep playing.
And Bachar has an unwavering belief and motivation to continue.
Age forecasting is hard. It’s also hard not to be biased in favour of Houli, of course.