E
easy_tiger
Guest
spook said:
the clarence looks like the PNG highlands today. Im gonna tie a couple of 44's to the veranda posts.
GWS by 24.5 @ $6 looks a bet in the circumstances.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
AFL Betting Thread
- Thread starter palmyscum
- Start date
the clarence looks like the PNG highlands today. Im gonna tie a couple of 44's to the veranda posts.
GWS by 24.5 @ $6 looks a bet in the circumstances.
E
easy_tiger
Guest
Seems like im punting like noones watching. which is a good way to punt.
tigers got the blows this week. which is normally a bad sign. But this week just reflects the nervous nature of tiger fans, the pretty latent potency of our outfit, and an anomalous lack of understanding by the bookies.
We'll start close to $3.5. Ports form is rubbish. marginally rubbisher than ours.
So if youve got big swingin' coconuts, or ovaries like goddam pungas, its free money for us tigers this frydy.
tigers got the blows this week. which is normally a bad sign. But this week just reflects the nervous nature of tiger fans, the pretty latent potency of our outfit, and an anomalous lack of understanding by the bookies.
We'll start close to $3.5. Ports form is rubbish. marginally rubbisher than ours.
So if youve got big swingin' coconuts, or ovaries like goddam pungas, its free money for us tigers this frydy.
Was going to back us until saw teams Easy.
Reckon we have gone in too top heavy and Port will run us off our legs, especially running the ball out of defence.
Reckon we have gone in too top heavy and Port will run us off our legs, especially running the ball out of defence.
E
easy_tiger
Guest
easy said:Seems like im punting like noones watching. which is a good way to punt.
tigers got the blows this week. which is normally a bad sign. But this week just reflects the nervous nature of tiger fans, the pretty latent potency of our outfit, and an anomalous lack of understanding by the bookies.
We'll start close to $3.5. Ports form is rubbish. marginally rubbisher than ours.
So if youve got big swingin' coconuts, or ovaries like goddam pungas, its free money for us tigers this frydy.
Easy best way to back the Tigers is to bet against them. Put $20 on them to lose every week. That way you get a nice return at the end of the year. And if you did happen to lose for the year you won't be disappointed at it would mean we have performed.
Leysy Days said:
Balls out all the way. When you're judgement is that good you'll usually back more than one winner. So laying off isn't the answer IMO. You'll have other insights. Did you have anything on Adelaide for the flag?
E
easy_tiger
Guest
easy said:then have 20% of your winnings on Dusty for Brownlow at $51, fully franked
Its been a lean year punting, and a miserable year alluding to tips on this and the GG's thread.
So Im bumping my one glory, just to make myself feel a bit better.
Thing is, I went in to take a slice of 50's and they were into 25's and I walked out in disgust. Then I went back to take a slice of 25's, and they were 10's, and I walked out in disgust again.
I suppose that what us punters do best. one way or another.
ok...first post on the betting thread...
Adelaide, Geelong, Essendon, Sydney, Port, North...paying $21
Adelaide under 39
Geelong under 39
Essendon under 39
Sydney under 39
Port under 39
North over 39
...Paying $1500 per $1
Ad under 39
Gee under 39
Ess under 39
Syd under 39
Port under 39
North under 39
...Paying around $450 per $1
All hinges on North winning with nothing to play for
Adelaide, Geelong, Essendon, Sydney, Port, North...paying $21
Adelaide under 39
Geelong under 39
Essendon under 39
Sydney under 39
Port under 39
North over 39
...Paying $1500 per $1
Ad under 39
Gee under 39
Ess under 39
Syd under 39
Port under 39
North under 39
...Paying around $450 per $1
All hinges on North winning with nothing to play for
jasonoska said:ok...first post on the betting thread...
Adelaide, Geelong, Essendon, Sydney, Port, North...paying $21
Adelaide under 39
Geelong under 39
Essendon under 39
Sydney under 39
Port under 39
North over 39
...Paying $1500 per $1
Ad under 39
Gee under 39
Ess under 39
Syd under 39
Port under 39
North under 39
...Paying around $450 per $1
All hinges on North winning with nothing to play for
Good luck mate.
I've got a hunch that the Dochers might have a win for Pavlich's last game, so i'm going to take a Multi...... Dockers into Sr7/1 for the win into Mr 6/3 for the place that's paying $42.31.
And then Dockers into Sr7/4 for the win into Mr 6/3 for the place that's paying $22.36.
E
easy_tiger
Guest
jasonoska said:ok...first post on the betting thread...
Adelaide, Geelong, Essendon, Sydney, Port, North...paying $21
Adelaide under 39
Geelong under 39
Essendon under 39
Sydney under 39
Port under 39
North over 39
...Paying $1500 per $1
Ad under 39
Gee under 39
Ess under 39
Syd under 39
Port under 39
North under 39
...Paying around $450 per $1
All hinges on North winning with nothing to play for
unhinged pretty early that one janoski. thats punting.
I sort of made money today by not getting to back Dusty to kick a goal.
jeez. what a *smile* *smile* year
Callum Mills this yaers Rising Star. Poor Petracca, he never stood a chance after the Kiss Of Death chose him. Oh Magoo, you never cease to amaze with your tips, I mean how can one man be so wrong so often? Incredible.Leysy Days said:
