2024 Richmond Coach | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

2024 Richmond Coach

So the colonwood game style isn’t based on chaos football? Difference being, as I see it, they have added a layer of skill in delivering the ball and are super aggressive. Still based on our successful style however they are doing it much better.
A more polished version of our high pressure chaos footy. Think I'll wait till they've won a flag or three before I decide if they're doing it better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I don’t really care if the players love Mini, the footy club is first and foremost their place of employment and not a social club.
That'd be all we need. Forty odd players all putting me me me before team because it's a paid job not a social club.
Pretty sure one of Benny's main criteria for the new coach is his empathy and emotional I.Q. He wants a team and people relationship builder for the next coach to continue growing the culture that Dimma, Balmey and the rest have established.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
We have the perfect player Mansell tuff , hard and a pest , but we play him as a forward there's your player. We just refuse to lock down a player the week before Ward of gws took him out of the game.
Mansell's excellent at tagging. Each week he takes himself out of the game.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
I don't think it would be hard at all. Under Hardwick we have regularly implemented different styles. Think it was last year we played a block of games (and won them) with a massive increase in uncontested marks, a real kick-mark, kick-mark Collingwood Buckley style of play.

At the very least I would have liked to see some movement on what I think is our greatest weakness under Hardwick and the thing that is hurting us the most now, and that is developing an ability to play different modes with the ball.

What I mean by that is under Hardwick you win the ball and you go. The plus one stays deepest and everyone else has licence to kill. Doesn't matter if it was off a quick play or a slow play, if it is first minute of the game or the last 30 seconds of the quarter.

At our best we could get away with it because if we didn't win the ball forward (which was a rare if), we had Rance or Grimes or Vlastuin or Astbury that would provide a mighty defence if it bounced back.

As our ability to win those forward contests has declined, so has our ability to defend behind it just through natural attrition of those stars so we get caught a lot on what they call the turnover turnover. They give it up, we give it back and then they score. The type of goals that come when teams stream forward into a relatively open forward line.

I would have loved McQualter to address that like McRae has at Collingwood. Have modes where you win the ball and go slow, because you aren't set up defensively to charge. Basically it is defending when you have the ball. Or the other one we have never done which has cost us a lot of percentage over the years, take minutes out of the game when you are well up with slow ball use.

Really easy to implement, just a mindset change when you have the ball in your hand.
Regarding Collingwood’s different ‘modes’, on many occasions this year I’ve watched them go on blistering runs that begin in their defensive 50 and then turn into seemingly unstoppable chains all the way down the ground for a goal.

So are the effectiveness of these plays a result of choosing to ‘flip the switch’ so to speak at the right time, instead of just just trying to launch whenever they happen to get the ball?

And would that mean that better discipline / work rate from the team would in theory create better structures around the ground, which would enable these types of ‘launches’ to happen more often?

Enter the coaching / game plan I suppose…
 
Mansell has the application but not the athleticism to go with Bont - Bont would destroy him in the air, just roll forward. The best taggers could compete in the air - Ling, Crowley
McIntosh maybe could be a tagger. On current form he ain't a class winger. Far from it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Applicants progressing to the next stage of the coaching process were apparently notified yesterday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Listening to a podcast with Shorty and Boobs Broad and they mentioned the leadership group has detailed to the club what they want and expect from our next coach.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
I don’t really care if the players love Mini, the footy club is first and foremost their place of employment and not a social club.

I’m confident the club will employ a quality person as its next senior coach, one who the players will quickly learn to respect.

I do wonder what the players hope to gain by publicly endorsing Mini. If the club wants their opinion they’d ask them privately not through the media. Any assumption by the players that they should have a say on who is the next coach is misguided and smacks of hubris on their part
It's pretty harmless. The players are constantly schooled to support each other on the field and off. Mini wants the job and it isn't really surprising to see players publicly offer support in these circumstances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Listening to a podcast with Shorty and Boobs Broad and they mentioned the leadership group has detailed to the club what they want and expect from our next coach.
Face Palm No GIF


Tail out to wag the dog?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Listening to a podcast with Shorty and Boobs Broad and they mentioned the leadership group has detailed to the club what they want and expect from our next coach.
I’m sure the club will give the players expectations the respect they deserve and then appoint the best candidate for the job regardless.

Keeps the players happy in that they believe they are part of the process, also means they are more likely to get on board with the new coach as they feel they had a hand in selecting them.

No need to upset the apple cart just let the players believe they’re part of selection process. I’m sure most of the players wants would be on the selection panels desired qualities as well.

It’s a win win.
 
Listening to a podcast with Shorty and Boobs Broad and they mentioned the leadership group has detailed to the club what they want and expect from our next coach.
Upset the cart or not there opinion in this appointment should have no bearing with Gale , Balme etc they know what's best for the club.
 
Upset the cart or not there opinion in this appointment should have no bearing with Gale , Balme etc they know what's best for the club.
As the primary workforce, how they react to the manager is important.
Dimma talks about shifting the coaches desks nearer to the food/social areas which subsequently helped improve relatiobships and connection between players and coaches.

But people would underestimate Benny Gale to think he would be misguided and pick an inadequate coach because the players like him
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Categorically not so. We have changed our entry to forward 50, changed our transition avenues and who we hit up to and how. I've had it explained to me and watched the training drills and then closely watched during a game and see it being executed.

I didn't mean to suggest it was a deliberate action.

Regarding Collingwood’s different ‘modes’, on many occasions this year I’ve watched them go on blistering runs that begin in their defensive 50 and then turn into seemingly unstoppable chains all the way down the ground for a goal.

So are the effectiveness of these plays a result of choosing to ‘flip the switch’ so to speak at the right time, instead of just just trying to launch whenever they happen to get the ball?

And would that mean that better discipline / work rate from the team would in theory create better structures around the ground, which would enable these types of ‘launches’ to happen more often?

Enter the coaching / game plan I suppose…

In simple terms the difference I see in us and Collingwood is we are one paced in offence and they have gears.

Under Hardwick we would aim to win turnover and then launch. Everyone had licence to go so we would get those beautiful waves of running players charging down the ground. It didn't matter what the circumstances were, if you won the ball you pull the trigger.

Collingwood do the same but only do so if they are organised defensively. So if the opposition have moved the ball quickly and they are not set defensively, they will play slow with sideways and backwards kicks until they are ready. Often the Collingwood charge comes off the second turnover, ie opposition charge, Collingwood win and go slow, opposition win ball and then Collingwood get the turnover set and charge.

In our case we always said bad luck defenders, we are going and you can work it out best you can. We would have the deepest defender and everyone else was free to run. That was all good when we would win the ball forward most times and when we had a superstar like Grimes or Rance to be that deep defender and save the day time and again, not so good now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users