And a no extracting of urine question, why Whitlock ahead of Armstrong?
If we got Armstrong at that pick I’d be stoked.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
2024 Phantom Draft
- Thread starter toothless
- Start date
If we got Armstrong at that pick I’d be stoked.
Norfs would have been rapt to have Kako, Dell, but Bengal was always a chance to take Faull before our 18. I'd have come a gutser then.
Because I'm getting Cadman next year and Whitlock is a better complement. Because Whitlock's 200cm, quick, runs all day, can relieve ruck, find it 25 times and is still raw with a heap of improvement to come. I see him as our Lynch heir.
- Mar 6, 2004
- 2,595
- 1,960
- 59
Last edited:
Great pick
I personally doubt he gets past #15
Freo and GWS would bite your hand off to grab this boy. Would love him at Richmond if we did the Port trade for #13
Why is everyone ( not Spook specifically) so convinced we are getting Cadman?
Haven’t heard any whispers besides PRE.
I have.
Anyway, even leaving out the better fit alongside Cadman, it's pretty close between Whitlock and Armstrong for me. Whitlock taller, better athlete (pace, leap, running ability). Would be happy with either.
