-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
2024 Draft Thread
- Thread starter Mr T.
- Start date
#Lolnorf could always do 7 n 32 or future pick from StKiddenme for 2 if they think we're gunna bend them over n pillage them to hard.
Only way to keep North feel like they belong in the AFL.
They're hardly a commercial asset similar the Suns..
Peace be with you as it must be a sad world if two Tiger supporters can't have an amicable discussion.
no we don't as it's not the direction the game has gone over the past 8 years.
Yes they could.
But they'd have to do it before draft night and or know for certain we're not trading 6.
What ? But you are the Magic Pudding predictor of trades spoof !
You've changed very old man. You've changed.
Last edited:
Perhaps St KIlda could be the party to get a Pick 2 trade over the line. Not sure we'd be doing this, as it takes away all out picks for talls later in the draft, maybe we would throw up a future 2nd instead of 1 of them, but this probably isn't a million miles away. Would we trade those 3 at the back end of the 1st round (all will end up picks in the 20's) for Pick 2? Depends I suppose on how good we think FOS could be. We could then slide back from 11 if we wanted to, there would be plenty of offers.
Richmond In - Pick 2. Out Picks 18, 20 and 23
Saints In - Picks 18 and 20. Out Pick 7
North In - Picks 7 and 23. Out 2
Going into the draft would leave us with Picks 1, 2, 6, 10, 11 and 24.
Would seem to satisfy all parties on what they were after, assuming we were ok with using those 3 picks up.
Richmond - Gets another top draftee for the cost of 3 20's picks, retains all of 6, 10 and 11
Saints - Have said they are interested to split - Giants could beat our offer if they wanted to
North - Probably keeps a pick that gets Tauru (only Melbourne could take him, I don't think the will personally) and gets them another pick in the "talls" region of the draft
Richmond In - Pick 2. Out Picks 18, 20 and 23
Saints In - Picks 18 and 20. Out Pick 7
North In - Picks 7 and 23. Out 2
Going into the draft would leave us with Picks 1, 2, 6, 10, 11 and 24.
Would seem to satisfy all parties on what they were after, assuming we were ok with using those 3 picks up.
Richmond - Gets another top draftee for the cost of 3 20's picks, retains all of 6, 10 and 11
Saints - Have said they are interested to split - Giants could beat our offer if they wanted to
North - Probably keeps a pick that gets Tauru (only Melbourne could take him, I don't think the will personally) and gets them another pick in the "talls" region of the draft
If it ends up being that, then the statue of Hartley will be erected by December.
Not too mention the countless of other erections by members of PRE.
but st kilda want two picks in the first 10, losing seven and 32 is worst the eagles losing pick 3
Mods, maybe @The_General can we move (or stop) this trivial ongoing stuff about the worth of points for picks that's taken over this thread.
It's been a ripper thread with great debate and opinion on juniors on the JUNIOR board. Let's not lose that.
There is a thread on the main board called Trade Week Richmond Only for that stuff.
It's been a ripper thread with great debate and opinion on juniors on the JUNIOR board. Let's not lose that.
There is a thread on the main board called Trade Week Richmond Only for that stuff.
I had an erection the other day that I don’t consider countless. I was very impressed by it actually.
Yup, happy to Leysy.
Am not at home at the moment for cup weekend, but I'll do some trimming etc later tonight.
Maybe folks can stick to talking about potential draftees from here out.
There's rules about people continually regurgitating the same argument, I try not to police them too much personally (obviously) as I hope folks can be adults and realise the conversation is getting stale. Also don't want to censor debate but if the general consensus is its getting out of hand feel free to report a post to attract our attention.
We can step in with truncheon and handcuffs if required. Much easier and more fun for all when folks behave maturely and just move on though.
Possibly, but they did say they were open to trading back for 2 later picks, this gives them an option for that. No idea whether thats the slide back they want or would accept, but its an option.
Just saw an article on Oliver by Twomey , only saw him in one of the carnival games , looked a likely type with nice boot , wouldn’t mind him at Punt rd
Agreed.
Just like how you and I got over our differences regarding the JVR over Brown debate.
Handled with poise and maturity.
Once you conceded I was correct
General Franco and the Fascists!!
I’ve been truncheoned and handcuffed plenty of times. And I didn’t even do nuffin. Nuffin I tell ya.
Bloody sooks, Private schoolboys and lefties…..on here .
I hope we don’t draft any of them. Or if we do, they can change
So just to be clear, is that this thread is talk about the juniors and the Trade thread to discuss picks, points and what draft hand we have?
I can work with that
