And right under our noses for a couple of seasons.
What didn’t we see?
I get it but to me the draft and trading game is way more complex than that.Yeah will be a big watch on Nate Caddy. Not a lot of doubt that is he we draft at our pick if we don't trade for Hopper.
Hopefully not a massive sliding doors moment (in a bad way) for us.
Also have to factor in the Taranto and Hopper deals, though separate, were done knowing both would come to the club. Who’s to say if we didn’t get Hopper, that GWS wouldn’t have asked for 12 and a future first for Taranto, instead of 12 and 19? You just never know what could’ve happened. As you say, I believe in Hopper too. Needs a big preseason and some continuity.I get it but to me the draft and trading game is way more complex than that.
Doors close and others open
Maybe if we had taken Roughead instead of Tambling we wouldn’t have got Cotchin and then Martin ?
I prefer to not look back
Hopper will be a good player for us imo
Yes. To me the important thing is how the deal looks at the time. Everyone, or a decent majority at the very least, was rapt with the Hopper deal at the time. It still looks good to me, maybe not as good but still good.I get it but to me the draft and trading game is way more complex than that.
Doors close and others open
Maybe if we had taken Roughead instead of Tambling we wouldn’t have got Cotchin and then Martin ?
I prefer to not look back
Hopper will be a good player for us imo
We also know that if Caddy turns out to be a good player he will join Holmes and Van Rooyen ( aka vandenhoogenband) on Zips’ theoretical Richmond teamAlso have to factor in the Taranto and Hopper deals, though separate, were done knowing both would come to the club. Who’s to say if we didn’t get Hopper, that GWS wouldn’t have asked for 12 and a future first for Taranto, instead of 12 and 19? You just never know what could’ve happened. As you say, I believe in Hopper too. Needs a big preseason and some continuity.
BiddiscombeYes. To me the important thing is how the deal looks at the time. Everyone, or a decent majority at the very least, was rapt with the Hopper deal at the time. It still looks good to me, maybe not as good but still good.
The Biddescombe deal not so much. Looked terrible at the time, and turned out that way.
Everything is easy in hindsight.
Yze son as wellThere’s a bunch of father sons next year.
Camporeale twins, Ashcroft, Welsh, Burgoyne, Montgomery and Francou boys.
Guess who’s loaded up in 2024…..
Yeah will be a big watch on Nate Caddy. Not a lot of doubt that is he we draft at our pick if we don't trade for Hopper.
Hopefully not a massive sliding doors moment (in a bad way) for us.
I reckon we would have taken Curtin but maybe that's personal bias. Caddy''s sprint time did put me at ease though, I think if he does eke out another few centimetres he could be a genuine power forward, Essendon did well with that draft hand.Yeah will be a big watch on Nate Caddy. Not a lot of doubt that is he we draft at our pick if we don't trade for Hopper.
Hopefully not a massive sliding doors moment (in a bad way) for us.