10,000,000 Cousins threads [Merged] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

10,000,000 Cousins threads [Merged]

Will Ben Cousins Be Playing In The AFL Next Year?

  • Yes, At The Eagles

    Votes: 9 3.4%
  • Yes, At Another Club

    Votes: 92 35.0%
  • No

    Votes: 136 51.7%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 26 9.9%

  • Total voters
    263
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

mb64 said:
mj72 said:
I think an important little titbit in the article is that he would not be staying on-site
sounds like the exercise is more about creating an impression of making an effort to keep everyone happy.
not that I blame him, I doubt he has a serious problem with drugs....good luck to him anyway, I'd almost not mind seeing him playing well against us again.
I would have thought staying on-site to be more effective.

yeah...that's my point
you would think anyone with an addiction would stay on-site.
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

mj72 said:
mb64 said:
mj72 said:
I think an important little titbit in the article is that he would not be staying on-site
sounds like the exercise is more about creating an impression of making an effort to keep everyone happy.
not that I blame him, I doubt he has a serious problem with drugs....good luck to him anyway, I'd almost not mind seeing him playing well against us again.
I would have thought staying on-site to be more effective.

yeah...that's my point
you would think anyone with an addiction would stay on-site.
You would assume when he is not at the clinic someone will be watching him.Still reckon he'd be better to be onsite.
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

mj72 said:
mb64 said:
mj72 said:
I think an important little titbit in the article is that he would not be staying on-site
sounds like the exercise is more about creating an impression of making an effort to keep everyone happy.
not that I blame him, I doubt he has a serious problem with drugs....good luck to him anyway, I'd almost not mind seeing him playing well against us again.
I would have thought staying on-site to be more effective.

yeah...that's my point
you would think anyone with an addiction would stay on-site.

Very suprised to hear that he will be off site, just thought to get the best help be an inpatient.
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

AstuteTiger said:
mj72 said:
mb64 said:
mj72 said:
I think an important little titbit in the article is that he would not be staying on-site
sounds like the exercise is more about creating an impression of making an effort to keep everyone happy.
not that I blame him, I doubt he has a serious problem with drugs....good luck to him anyway, I'd almost not mind seeing him playing well against us again.
I would have thought staying on-site to be more effective.

yeah...that's my point
you would think anyone with an addiction would stay on-site.

Very suprised to hear that he will be off site, just thought to get the best help be an inpatient.
Agree
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

mj72 said:
I think an important little titbit in the article is that he would not be staying on-site
sounds like the exercise is more about creating an impression of making an effort to keep everyone happy.
not that I blame him, I doubt he has a serious problem with drugs....good luck to him anyway, I'd almost not mind seeing him playing well against us again.
I also would like to think he still doesn't have a serious problem but I am afraid we could both be wrong. A decision that he is ready to leave after what 4 weeks sounds very much like a 'Brittany' to me.

From my understanding there is little chance that a pschological addiction to amphetamines as distinct from a physical addiction, can be disposed of in such a short time. And if I were his father/ mother I would be especially concerned about the idea that he will be returning to a non residential facility.

Querry also whether the reported A$60,000 spent by West Coast has already been gobbled up or whether this is an 'early departure' decision that has been made by Ben.
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

momentai said:
Querry also whether the reported A$60,000 spent by West Coast has already been gobbled up or whether this is an 'early departure' decision that has been made by Ben.

Still amazed that the AFL will provide assistance to the Weagle for the $60,000 that forked out for Cousins treatment.
Surely Cousins should have footed the bill in this instance. :p
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

Tigers of Old said:
momentai said:
Querry also whether the reported A$60,000 spent by West Coast has already been gobbled up or whether this is an 'early departure' decision that has been made by Ben.

Still amazed that the AFL will provide assistance to the Weagle for the $60,000 that forked out for Cousins treatment.
Surely Cousins should have footed the bill in this instance. :p
Can't see why West Coast footed the bill,just show the players run the show over there.
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

shouldnt be playing at all....my bet is that he was using the gear while playing...infact im confident he was....
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

tigers80 said:
shouldnt be playing at all....my bet is that he was using the gear while playing...infact im confident he was....
He & a few of his teammates.
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

A bloke with an admitted/acknowledged addiction is not found by the AFL's 'most stringent' drug policy. Almost laughable in isolation. That said player has rehab paid for by club and/or AFL even more laughable.

Returns against all evidence and advice that addiction could not have been overcome in such a short time.


No wonder the Eagles do what they want, the AFL pander to it.
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

jb03 said:
A bloke with an admitted/acknowledged addiction is not found by the AFL's 'most stringent' drug policy. Almost laughable in isolation.
Amphetamines are out of your system and undetectable in urine tests after 48 hours. A player just needs to leave his phone turned off for a couple of days after going out and he doesn't need to worry about it.
 
Re: Ben Cousins in trouble again

jb03 said:
A bloke with an admitted/acknowledged addiction is not found by the AFL's 'most stringent' drug policy. Almost laughable in isolation. That said player has rehab paid for by club and/or AFL even more laughable.

Returns against all evidence and advice that addiction could not have been overcome in such a short time.


No wonder the Eagles do what they want, the AFL pander to it.
Yep,indeed they do.
 
Re: Cousins Story Sold to Nine

tigersforever06 said:
Anyone else heard anything about this

Reported on bigfooty.com

If it's true and the money doesn't go to a charity it's a total disgrace. This man has taken illegal drugs, dishonoured his club (which I admit takes some doing when you're a West Coast Eagle) and generally conducted himself of late as an irresponsible buffoon. You should not be rewarded for breaking the law and carrying on as he has done. It's a terrible message to the general community and frankly he just doesn't deserve it.
 
Re: Cousins Story Sold to Nine

It couldn't possibly be true. After all the bad PR the club has had over the past few months they wouldn't be this stupid...........you would think. :eek:

Edit - Anyway, I'm sure the money is going to charity..........if it wasn't before it will be now. ;)
 
Re: Cousins Story Sold to Nine

If that money doesn't go to charity, the proverbial manure will hit the proverbial air conditioning.

Not only did Cousins get the AFL to foot the bill for his trip to LA, he's making money off Channel Eddie for his story? Couldn't happen.
 
Re: Cousins Story Sold to Nine

Cousins did not get the AFL to foot the bill for his trip, it was just not included in the Eagles salary cap total payer payments. I would hope that any medical treatments to our players, esp Brown, are not included in the salary cap either.

As far as selling the story and the proceeds going to charity, who cares as long as Cousins isn't rewarded for being a druggie. It is channel Collingwood's money, if they choose to donate a hundred large to a worthwhile cause, good on them.
 
Re: Cousins Story Sold to Nine

Tambling Man said:
Cousins did not get the AFL to foot the bill for his trip, it was just not included in the Eagles salary cap total player payments.

The difference is? It's still money. :spin
The AFL has taken a very soft stance on this issue to date.

As for Cousins? If indeed he is getting paid personally for the interview it is a disgrace.
Should fall under the law that prevents criminals profiting from illegal activity.

I'm still expecting the AFL to hand down a very long suspension now the the dust has settled and make a real example of Ben.