i'm sure you're right mate. I'm sure I read somewhere that vlad said he had to nominate for the ND, not the psd.mtench said:Has to nominate for the national draft i first i think
Something of a turnaround there Tiger. Good for you.Tigers of Old said:If took him with our first or second draft selection, I would be rope-able.
It would be incredibly short sighted and has the potential to make the McMahon deal look like genius.
PSD would be a different story, if he's passed as fit.
momentai said:Something of a turnaround there Tiger. Good for you.
For the last 12 months you have been saying you don't want him at the RFC.Tigers of Old said:Not a turnaround at all, I have taken this stance previously.
I was fiercely against taking Cousins in the midst of his drug addiction and I will stand by that.
No way on the planet I would have taken him then and I had my doubts he'd even get back to playing again.
However if he can show he is clean and get is getting his life on track, then he may be worth a punt at low risk with zero tolerance clause.
He is still to get back though. It isn't a done deal yet..
momentai said:For the last 12 months you have been saying you don't want him at the RFC.
Tigers of Old said:Whilst the odds are stacked against him, good luck to him if he gets clean, I wouldn't wish harm on Ben or anyone with a life threatening habit but I am far from convinced by the argument that a football club environment is the best place for Bender to change his notorious party boy ways..
If he is 100% committed to having another shot at football then he might be worth a low cost punt in the PSD but please excuse me if I have my sceptism because some things are no longer up for argument.
So by all means let Greg Miller buy Benny a cup of coffee, just make sure it's decaffinated.
Is that the best you can come up with. What a pathetic hypocrite. You have consistently bagged this bloke and bagged the idea that the Tigers should take any interest at all.Tigers of Old said:Do your research before posting what I have said.
momentai said:Is that the best you can come up with. What a pathetic hypocrite. You have consistently bagged this bloke and bagged the idea that the Tigers should take any interest at all.
You havn't even bothered to include the whole of the post you have quoted??Tigers of Old said:lol it is there for all to see.
You hate being shown to be wrong hence the slagging comes out. :
Go back to staring at the posters of benny on your wall momentai.
momentai said:You havn't even bothered to include the whole of the post you have quoted??
GoodOne said:Good addition if he can be grabbed in the PSD, failing tha the LSD.
momentai said:Look I am delighted that people are now beginning to look at the advantages Ben might bring to Richmond. And particularly pleased to see it in someone who has been such a passionate advocate for the anti- Ben cause. As I said, well done.
Snap said:And the speed and crack and dope and trips etc, etc, etc......... what an inspiration! :hihi
It was relevant in the sense that Ben will always be an addict and your threads consistently bemoaned the idea of putting an addict in a football club enviroment because of the impact that may have on young players. No where do you suggest he should come to Richmond in any circumstances and your about face is and now denial is a hoot.Tigers of Old said:What has that got to do with you being wrong?
I didn't post the rest of it because it isn't relevant to what you said.
My views in the first part of that post have not changed one bit.
Cousins is an admitted drug addict. He was a liability around his former club and likely would have been around a new one until he dealt with his problem directly. That meant getting punted from the comp for a year. If he gets back that decision by the AFL will be deemed to have been correct.
But as I said he is not back and playing AFL again yet & Benny's battle will be a constant one for the rest of his life but if he can show he's clean and can prove he's been off the gear for some time then it might be worth a (low)risk in the PSD.
I don't see anything hypocritical about that at all.