-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Which player would you trade
- Thread starter Tigermad2005
- Start date
You trade players that have outperformed their own ceiling for a season and look like you will never see another season as good. For exaple Pettifer that year he kicked 40 odd goals. You don't trade players that are under performing compared to their capabilites eg. Tambling. You wont get any value for Tambling at the moment, at least wait till his is worth something.
On that measurement you'd probably consider trading Tuck and McGuane. No way I'd trade Morton. Thursty and Nahas probably aren't worth anythng now that they are getting dropped(although I think Nahahs still has a future with us, just needs a go).
Dangling Rance is a good idea. Whoever in this thread that said his is still young enough that some club migght believe they can fix him was spot on.
On that measurement you'd probably consider trading Tuck and McGuane. No way I'd trade Morton. Thursty and Nahas probably aren't worth anythng now that they are getting dropped(although I think Nahahs still has a future with us, just needs a go).
Dangling Rance is a good idea. Whoever in this thread that said his is still young enough that some club migght believe they can fix him was spot on.
No other team is going to give a high draft pick for players like Tambling, Jackson, Rance, Thursty, Nahas, etc. We would be lucky to get a second round pick for any of these guys which is not necessarily going to be an upgrade for us.
Given the number of injury issues I don't reckon anyone would give a high pick for Foley (see the Luke Ball situation). We would be lucky to get a late 1st round pick I reckon, which again is not worth it especially if Foley can get fit.
The only players we have that would get high draft picks are Deledio, Cotchin, Martin, Jack and Vickory. All of which we drafted with high draft picks and we would be stupid to trade any of them.
Given the number of injury issues I don't reckon anyone would give a high pick for Foley (see the Luke Ball situation). We would be lucky to get a late 1st round pick I reckon, which again is not worth it especially if Foley can get fit.
The only players we have that would get high draft picks are Deledio, Cotchin, Martin, Jack and Vickory. All of which we drafted with high draft picks and we would be stupid to trade any of them.
CC TIGER said:
Yep for the right price there wouldn't be too many I wouldn't trade
the key being the right price
hopefully GC don't sign many senior players and have to trade for them
davidrodan said:
We actually might have a few of interest but we'rel ooking at third rounders. Luke might get us a top 20 GC pick seeing they've got lots to splash around. Gold Cost boy and mature body.
Polo looks out of favour - he will be of interest. I can see essendon picking him up as a tagger/inside mid.
Morton, I'd say Dogs, Saints, Blues, Swans would be interested.
Rance probably top of sell lsit if we can get second rounder from Hawks.
And Jordy is better than Hunt so maybe we can get a top 10 pick from GC.
RT. GWS or GC will give us over the odds, say 25, maybe even better. I wouldn't give him away though, yet.
OK. The coach says we need some outside running midfielders. Who's available to fit the bill? And who needs to be traded to get them? :-\
Tigers of Old said:
Oh dear. As an outside running midfielder i think he'd be a round peg in a square a hole.
I still think he's great value to Richmond on the HFF and particularly the HBF.
I don't think he'll be the player we hoped he would be.
I'd be very pleased if he proved me to be a poor judge.
Rance & Tambling, only if Tambling represents something decent, otherwise hold on
I thought I remembered reading somewhere potentially Rance for Vezpremi
Tambling just seems to be going backwards after a decent year last year, has probably been overtaken by other fringe types
I thought I remembered reading somewhere potentially Rance for Vezpremi
Tambling just seems to be going backwards after a decent year last year, has probably been overtaken by other fringe types
Disco08 said:
disagree completely. He has the 'potential' aura and occassionally shows he has a hint of class. I strongly believe, and I'd put money on it, we'll get over the odds for him from one of the new clubs for these reasons. 25 or better, I'd jump at it. Could get as low as 17/18.
