He’s been decent when given chances in the seniors. I think it’s all conjecture until he’s given a few games to prove himself.
So, in terms of his clearance rate, he's been up near the best in his draft year from memory. The issue I feel was when we got him, he had an immature body and little endurance. I'm guessing (cause I barely ever watch juniors) he won a lot of contests as a kid because of his bulk, not his strength.
We need to strip down his body and rebuild him. All while trying to get him into our system, and teach him about 2 way running. This kid was never got to, nor expected to, jump in and have an impact straight away.
We've had covid which had impacted the development of all players. So the project process was set back again. All the while, there's been signs, that he still has his strengths (clearance ability). It can match AFL level bodies and intensity. No question. The concerns are all the other deficiencies in his game.
He hired a fitness coach reportedly and got himself in proper condition - Should he have done this before now? yep. Probably. But he didn't and now he has. So we owe him the chance to keep his spot and support him, not say delist after two or three games.
If he does enough, he's going to get a low base contract next year. If after 12ish games he's not stepped up, I'm sure he's going to struggle.
I think he's got the *potential* to be a clearance animal, and probably get to 100-150 games. He's not going to be Cripps, nor Bont, nor Ollie Wines. But so long as he helps us get first hands on the ball, our match winning capability can be achieved by others.
For every Cotchin and Dusty, you need a Grigg, Graham and Kamdyn.
The posts here though are people looking for him to fail. Saying he barely touches the ball, but the stats say he's had 24. Saying he's had a poor game, but the coaching staff say otherwise.
I trust our club, until demonstrate to us that they're not in touch with the game anymore. They built the dynasty after all.